Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36235824›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2022

Mapping the Homeostatic and Hedonic Brain Responses to Stevia Compared to Caloric Sweeteners and Water: A Double-Blind Randomised Controlled Crossover Trial in Healthy Adults.

Nikoleta S Stamataki, Shane Mckie, Corey Scott, Douwina Bosscher, Rebecca Elliott, John T McLaughlin

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Nikoleta S StamatakiDivision of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2842-3913
Shane MckieFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health Research and Innovation, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4418-8944
Corey ScottCargill R&D Center North America, Minneapolis, MN 55447, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3909-7228
Douwina BosscherCargill R&D Centre Europe, 1800 Vilvoorde, Belgium.
Rebecca ElliottNeuroscience and Psychiatry Unit, Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
John T McLaughlinDivision of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6158-5135
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBCargill (Belgium) · BECargill (United States) · US

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M011208/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-nutritive sweeteners have potential effects on brain function. We investigated neural correlates of responses to beverages differing in sweetness and calories. Healthy participants completed 4 randomised sessions: water vs. water with stevia, glucose, or maltodextrin. Blood-oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) contrast was monitored for 30 min post-ingestion by functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. A food visual probe task at baseline was repeated at 30 min. A significant interaction of taste-by-calories-by-time was demonstrated mainly in motor, frontal, and insula cortices. Consumption of the stevia-sweetened beverage resulted in greater BOLD decrease, especially in the 20-30 min period, compared to other beverages. There was a significant interaction of taste-by-time in BOLD response in gustatory and reward areas; sweet beverages induced greater reduction in BOLD compared to non-sweet. The interaction calories-by-time showed significantly greater incremental area under the curve in thalamic, visual, frontal, and parietal areas for glucose and maltodextrin 10-20 min post-consumption only, compared to water. In the visual cue task, the water demonstrated an increased response in the visual cortex to food images post-consumption; however, no difference was observed for the three sweet/caloric beverages. In conclusion, both sweet taste and calories exert modulatory effects, but stevia showed a more robust and prolonged effect.

Indexed as

Non-Nutritive SweetenersSteviaAdultBrainCross-Over StudiesDiterpenes, KauraneGlucoseGlucosidesHumansSweetening AgentsWaterDiterpenes, KauraneGlucoseGlucosidesNon-Nutritive SweetenerssteviosideSweetening AgentsWaterBOLDfMRIfood cuesglucosemaltodextrinneuroimagingphysMRIstevia

Identifiers

PMID36235824
PMCPMC9570671
OpenAlexW4303962382

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.