Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36242084›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering online2022

Viability of ex-vivo myography as a diagnostic tool for rectus abdominis muscle electrical activity collected at Cesarean section within a diamater cohort study.

David R A Reyes, Angelica M P Barbosa, Floriano F Juliana, Quiroz B C V Sofia, Sarah M B Costa, Raghavendra L S Hallur, Eusebio M A Enriquez, Rafael G Oliveira, Patricia de Souza Rossignolli, Cristiane Rodrigues Pedroni and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

David R A Reyes *Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Botucatu Medical School (FMB), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, CEP18618-687, Brazil.
Angelica M P Barbosa *Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Botucatu Medical School (FMB), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, CEP18618-687, Brazil.
Floriano F JulianaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Botucatu Medical School (FMB), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, CEP18618-687, Brazil.
Quiroz B C V SofiaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Botucatu Medical School (FMB), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, CEP18618-687, Brazil.
Sarah M B CostaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Botucatu Medical School (FMB), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, CEP18618-687, Brazil.
Raghavendra L S HallurDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Botucatu Medical School (FMB), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, CEP18618-687, Brazil.
Eusebio M A EnriquezDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Botucatu Medical School (FMB), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, CEP18618-687, Brazil.
Rafael G OliveiraDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Botucatu Medical School (FMB), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, CEP18618-687, Brazil.
Patricia de Souza RossignolliDepartment of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, School of Philosophy and Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Marilia, Brazil.
Cristiane Rodrigues PedroniDepartment of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, School of Philosophy and Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Marilia, Brazil.
Fernanda C B AlvesDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Botucatu Medical School (FMB), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, CEP18618-687, Brazil.
Gabriela A GarciaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Botucatu Medical School (FMB), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, CEP18618-687, Brazil.
Joelcio F AbbadeDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Botucatu Medical School (FMB), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, CEP18618-687, Brazil.
Carolina N F CarvalhoDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Botucatu Medical School (FMB), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, CEP18618-687, Brazil.
Luis SobreviaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Botucatu Medical School (FMB), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, CEP18618-687, Brazil.
Marilza V C Rudge *Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Botucatu Medical School (FMB), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, CEP18618-687, Brazil. marilzarudge@gmail.com.
Iracema I M P Calderon *Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Botucatu Medical School (FMB), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, CEP18618-687, Brazil.
Diamater Study Group

Funding

Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico FONDECYT 1190316Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo FAPESP 2016/01743-5Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo FAPESP 2018/10661-8
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEx-vivo myography enables the assessment of muscle electrical activity response. This study explored the viability of determining the physiological responses in muscles without tendon, as rectus abdominis muscle (RAM), through ex-vivo myography to assess its potential as a diagnostic tool.

resultsAll tested RAM samples (five different samples) show patterns of electrical activity. A positive response was observed in 100% of the programmed stimulation. RAM 3 showed greater weight (0.47 g), length (1.66 cm), and width (0.77 cm) compared to RAM 1, RAM 2, RAM 4 and RAM 5 with more sustained electrical activity over time, a higher percentage of fatigue was analyzed at half the time of the electrical activity. The order of electrical activity (Mn) was RAM 3 > RAM 5 > RAM 1 > RAM 4 > RAM 2. No electrical activity was recorded in the Sham group.

conclusionsThis study shows that it is feasible to assess the physiological responses of striated muscle without tendon as RAM, obtained at C-section, under ex vivo myography. These results could be recorded, properly analyzed, and demonstrated its potential as a diagnostic tool for rectus abdominis muscle electrical activity.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionRectus AbdominisCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMyographyPregnancyContractilityC-sectionMyographyRectus abdominis muscleSkeletal muscle

Identifiers

PMID36242084
PMCPMC9563120

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.