ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2022
Disentangling autoproteolytic cleavage from tethered agonist-dependent activation of the adhesion receptor ADGRL3.
Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adhesion G protein-coupled receptors.Pharmacological reviews · 2026Review
- Structural basis of GAIN domain autoproteolysis and cleavage-resistance in the adhesion G-protein coupled receptors.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Cytoplasmic tail diversity determines the effector bias of the adhesion GPCR ADGRL2.Cell chemical biology · 2026Article
- Synaptic Cell Adhesion: A Structural Perspective.Advances in neurobiology · 2026Review
- The adhesion GPCR ADGRL2 engages Gα13 to enable epidermal differentiation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Domain-specific N-glycosylation of the adhesion G-protein-coupled receptor ADGRG6 N-terminal fragment regulates trafficking, proteolytic processing, and signaling.Molecular biology of the cell · 2025Article
- N-terminal fragment shedding contributes to signaling of the full-length adhesion receptor ADGRL3.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2025Article
- Synaptic Gα12/13 signaling establishes hippocampal PV inhibitory circuits.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Conformational coupling between extracellular and transmembrane domains modulates holo-adhesion GPCR function.Nature communications · 2024Article
- GPR114/ADGRG5 is activated by its tethered peptide agonist because it is a cleaved adhesion GPCR.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2023Article
- Hexahydroquinoline Derivatives Are Selective Agonists for the Adhesion G Protein-Coupled Receptor ADGRG1/GPR56.Molecular pharmacology · 2023Article
- The adhesion GPCRs CELSR1-3 and LPHN3 engage G proteins via distinct activation mechanisms.Cell reports · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Adhesion G protein-coupled receptor latrophilin 3 (ADGRL3), a cell adhesion molecule highly expressed in the central nervous system, acts in synapse formation through trans interactions with its ligands. It is largely unknown if these interactions serve a purely adhesive function or can modulate G protein signaling. To assess how different structural elements of ADGRL3 (e.g., the adhesive domains, autoproteolytic cleavage site, or tethered agonist (TA)) impact receptor function, we require constructs that disrupt specific receptor features without impacting others. While we showed previously that mutating conserved Phe and Met residues in the TA of ADGRL3-C-terminal fragment (CTF), a CTF truncated to the G protein-coupled receptor proteolysis site, abolishes receptor-mediated G protein activation, we now find that autoproteolytic cleavage is disrupted in the full-length version of this construct. To identify a construct that disrupts TA-dependent activity without impacting proteolysis, we explored other mutations in the TA. We found that mutating the sixth and seventh residues of the TA, Leu and Met, to Ala impaired activity in a serum response element activity assay for both full-length and CTF constructs. We confirmed this activity loss results from impaired G protein coupling using an assay that acutely exposes the TA through controlled proteolysis. The ADGRL3 mutant expresses normally at the cell surface, and immunoblotting shows that it undergoes normal autoproteolysis. Thus, we found a construct that disrupts tethered agonism while retaining autoproteolytic cleavage, providing a tool to disentangle these functions in vivo. Our approach and specific findings are likely to be broadly applicable to other adhesion receptors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.