Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36249241›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in public health2022

High-intensity interval training among middle-aged and older adults for body composition and muscle strength: A systematic review.

María Alzar-Teruel, Agustín Aibar-Almazán, Fidel Hita-Contreras, María Del Carmen Carcelén-Fraile, Antonio Martínez-Amat, José Daniel Jiménez-García, Raquel Fábrega-Cuadros, Yolanda Castellote-Caballero

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

María Alzar-TeruelDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain.
Agustín Aibar-AlmazánDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain.
Fidel Hita-ContrerasDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain.
María Del Carmen Carcelén-FraileDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain.
Antonio Martínez-AmatDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain.
José Daniel Jiménez-GarcíaDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain.
Raquel Fábrega-CuadrosDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain.
Yolanda Castellote-CaballeroDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The aging of population is leading to the investigation of new options to achieve healthy aging. One of these options is high-intensity interval training (HIIT), although its effects on body composition and muscle strength are currently unclear. The objective of this systematic review is to examine the scientific publications on the effects of HIIT on the body composition and muscle strength of middle-aged and older adults. Methods: The search was carried out in the PubMed, Cochrane Plus, Web of Science, CINAHL and SciELO databases without limitation of publication dates. The literature search, data extraction and systematic review were performed following the PRISMA standards and the risk of bias of the selected studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk-of-Bias. Results: Initially 520 publications were identified, out of which a total of 8 articles were finally selected to be included in this systematic review. Improvements in body composition were seen in six of the selected items and an increase in muscle strength in seven of the eight. Regarding physical function, improvements were found in both gait speed and balance. Conclusions: This systematic review found that HIIT is effective in improving body composition and increasing muscle strength. However, when comparing HIIT to moderate-intensity continuous training, it is not clear that HIIT is more beneficial; a firm conclusion cannot be drawn due to the scarcity of published studies, their variety in methodology and the ambiguity of their results, so it is suggested to carry out more research in this area.

Indexed as

High-Intensity Interval TrainingBody CompositionMuscle Strengthbody compositionhigh-intensity interval training (HIIT)middle-agedmuscle strengtholder adultssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36249241
PMCPMC9557068

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.