Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36254495›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine2022

Improving the quality of bowel preparation by smartphone education platform prior to colonoscopy: a randomized trail.

Kai Zhao, Ruonan Dong, Suhong Xia, Lina Feng, Wangdong Zhou, Mingyu Zhang, Yu Zhang, Dean Tian, Mei Liu, Jiazhi Liao

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06569277 (Effects of a Smartphone Mobile Application on Quality of Bowel Preparation), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06569277 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effects of a Smartphone Mobile Application on Quality of Bowel Preparation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorDr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research HospitalRan2024 to 2024Enrolled104ConditionsBowel Preparation, Patient Experience, Patient SatisfactionArmsA mobile application
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kai ZhaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Ruonan DongDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Suhong XiaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Lina FengDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Wangdong ZhouDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Mingyu ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yu ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Dean TianDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Mei LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Jiazhi LiaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0640-2719
Tongji University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAdequate bowel preparation is an essential factor in colonoscopy. Enhanced education on the procedure of bowel preparation is very necessary for patients before colonoscopy. We analysed the influence of a novel education platform on bowel preparation quality before colonoscopy. PATIENTS AND

methodsThe study enrolled outpatients who underwent colonoscopy in the digestive endoscopy centre of Wuhan Tongji Hospital. They were divided into the control group and the intervention group according to different educational ways. The control group patients were provided with the regular colonoscopy preparation leaflet. The intervention group patients were asked to add the education platform. The primary outcome was the rate of adequate bowel preparation. The study was registered at Chinese ClinicalTrials.gov (ChiCTR2100053547, 24/11/2021).

resultsA total of 378 patients who underwent colonoscopy were enrolled, including 189 patients in the control group and 189 patients in the intervention group. The Boston bowel preparation score (BBPS) was significantly higher in the intervention group than that in the control group (

conclusionsThe smartphone education platform may effectively improve bowel preparation quality, PDR, and patients' compliance.Key messagesThe quality of bowel preparation mainly relies on the patients' compliance with the bowel preparation instructions.The study reveals that the superiority of the smartphone education platform by Mini Program in improving bowel preparation and colorectal polyp detection rate.The smartphone education platform may provide a more effective, convenient, and labour-saving way to provide further improvements to patients prior to colonoscopy.

Indexed as

CatharticsSmartphoneColonoscopyHumansProspective StudiesSingle-Blind MethodCatharticsBoston bowel preparation scoreBowel preparationcolonoscopyeducation platform

Identifiers

PMID36254495
PMCPMC9624253
OpenAlexW4306681210

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.