Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36257978›Full record

ReviewHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2023

Public and occupational health risks related to lead exposure updated according to present-day blood lead levels.

Yu-Ling Yu, Wen-Yi Yang, Azusa Hara, Kei Asayama, Harry A Roels, Tim S Nawrot, Jan A Staessen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02243904 (Study for Promotion of Health in Recycling Lead), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02243904 unknown statusnot on this map

Study for Promotion of Health in Recycling Lead

TypeobservationalSponsorKU LeuvenRan2015 to 2024Enrolled270ConditionsOccupational Exposure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. RbRSC advances · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Yu-Ling YuResearch Unit Environment and Health, KU Leuven Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Wen-Yi YangDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Azusa HaraDivision of Drug Development and Regulatory Science, Faculty of Pharmacy, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kei AsayamaDepartment of Hygiene and Public Health, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Harry A RoelsCenter for Environmental Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Tim S NawrotResearch Unit Environment and Health, KU Leuven Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Jan A StaessenNon-Profit Research Association Alliance for the Promotion of Preventive Medicine, Mechelen, Belgium. jan.staessen@appremed.org.
Hasselt University · BEKeio University · JPKU Leuven · BEShanghai First People's Hospital · CNTeikyo University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lead is an environmental hazard that should be addressed worldwide. Over time, human lead exposure in the western world has decreased drastically to levels comparable to those among humans living in the preindustrial era, who were mainly exposed to natural sources of lead. To re-evaluate the potential health risks associated with present-day lead exposure, a two-pronged approach was applied. First, recently published population metrics describing the adverse health effects associated with lead exposure at the population level were critically assessed. Next, the key results of the Study for Promotion of Health in Recycling Lead (SPHERL; NCT02243904) were summarized and put in perspective with those of the published population metrics. To our knowledge, SPHERL is the first prospective study that accounted for interindividual variability between people with respect to their vulnerability to the toxic effects of lead exposure by assessing the participants' health status before and after occupational lead exposure. The overall conclusion of this comprehensive review is that mainstream ideas about the public and occupational health risks related to lead exposure urgently need to be updated because a large portion of the available literature became obsolete given the sharp decrease in exposure levels over the past 40 years.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsOccupational ExposureOccupational HealthEnvironmental ExposureHumansLeadProspective StudiesLeadEnvironmental medicineHypertensionLeadMortalityOccupational medicine

Identifiers

PMID36257978
PMCPMC9899691
OpenAlexW4306677317

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.