Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36258074›Full record

ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2022

Antimicrobial Weapons of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Laura M Nolan, Luke P Allsopp

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. mSphere · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Engineering ofCells · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Laura M NolanNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK. l.nolan@imperial.ac.uk.
Luke P AllsoppNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK. l.allsopp@imperial.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a robust and versatile organism capable of surviving and prospering in a diverse array of environments and is an opportunistic pathogen of humans. One reason for the success of this pathogen is the large arsenal of antimicrobial weapons that it possesses. Here we focus our attention on these antimicrobial weapons and how they give P. aeruginosa a survival edge in polymicrobial environments. We define antimicrobial weapons as components produced by P. aeruginosa that are used to kill, inhibit growth and/or subvert key cellular functions in other microbes. P. aeruginosa has a large and complex genome and encodes an armament of antimicrobial weapons that fall into two subclasses; those that are delivered directly to competing microbes using a contact-dependent method, and those that are secreted in a contact-independent manner into the environment to then be available to target neighbouring cells. This chapter provides an overview of the major antimicrobial weapons possessed by P. aeruginosa, captures recent advances in the field and discusses how these could be targeted as a therapeutic intervention, or potentially harnessed to combat infection.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsPseudomonas aeruginosaAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsHumansAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsBacterial ProteinsBacterial protein secretionCDIEffectorsImmunity proteinPseudomonas aeruginosaPyocinT5SST6SSTailocinToxins

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.