Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36258839›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine research2022

A Newly Developed Interprofessional

Abdulrahman Y Sabbagh, Hala M Alzaid, Abdullah A Almarshed, Amani A Azizalrahman, Shady Elmasry, Claudia A Rosu, Usamah Alzoraigi, Abdulrahman Alzahrani, Ameera A Cluntun

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Abdulrahman Y SabbaghEmergency Department, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Hala M AlzaidEmergency Department, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah A AlmarshedCenter of Research, Education, Simulation, and Enhanced Training (CRESENT), King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Amani A AzizalrahmanCenter of Research, Education, Simulation, and Enhanced Training (CRESENT), King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Shady ElmasryAnesthesia Department, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Claudia A RosuCenter for Interprofessional Studies and Innovation, MGH Institute for Health Profession, Boston, MA, USA.
Usamah AlzoraigiCenter of Research, Education, Simulation, and Enhanced Training (CRESENT), King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahman AlzahraniEmergency Department, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ameera A CluntunSaudi Commissions for Health Specialties, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
King Fahd Medical City · SAMGH Institute of Health Professions · USSaudi Commission for Health Specialties · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Healthcare providers performing aerosol-generating procedures like airway management are at the highest risk for contamination with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We developed an Methods: We used a cross-sectional study design incorporating a quantitative questionnaire to describe participants' reaction to the ISS and a qualitative group interview using the plus-delta debriefing modality to explore participants' challenges in acquiring the knowledge and skills required for each learning objective. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and deductive content analysis. Results: Two hundred and ninety-nine healthcare providers participated in 62 ISS training sessions. Over 90% of our study participants agreed or strongly agreed that: they understood the learning objectives; the training material appropriately challenged them; the course content was relevant, easy to navigate, and essential; the facilitators' knowledge, teaching, and style were appropriate; the simulation facilities were suitable; and they had ample opportunities to practice the learned skills. The main challenges identified were anticipating difficult airways, preparing intubation equipment, minimizing the number of personnel inside the room, adhering to the proper doffing sequence, preparing needed equipment outside the intubation room, speaking up, and ensuring closed-loop communication. Conclusion: The newly developed ISS training was feasible for busy healthcare practitioners to safely perform airway management procedures for suspected or confirmed COVID-19 patients without affecting bedside care. Anticipation of difficult airways and speaking up were the most frequent challenges identified across all specialties in this study.

Indexed as

Airway managementCOVID-19EvaluationIn-situ simulationInterprofessional trainingKirkpatrick level 1PPESimulation-based education

Identifiers

PMID36258839
PMCPMC9534185
OpenAlexW4298008099

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.