Evidence mapPaperPMID 36260560Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Phytase dose-dependent response of kidney inositol phosphate levels in poultry.

Colleen Sprigg, Hayley Whitfield, Emily Burton, Dawn Scholey, Michael R Bedford, Charles A Brearley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Untangling Inositol (Pyro)Phosphate Biology Through Emerging Technologies.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in physiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Colleen SpriggSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Hayley WhitfieldSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Emily BurtonSchool of Animal, Rural and Environmental Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Southwell, United Kingdom.
Dawn ScholeySchool of Animal, Rural and Environmental Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Southwell, United Kingdom.
Michael R BedfordAB Vista, Marlborough, Wiltshire, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5308-4290
Charles A BrearleySchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6179-9109
University of East Anglia · GBNottingham Trent University · GBAB Vista (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M011216/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phytases, enzymes that degrade phytate present in feedstuffs, are widely added to the diets of monogastric animals. Many studies have correlated phytase addition with improved animal productivity and a subset of these have sought to correlate animal performance with phytase-mediated generation of inositol phosphates in different parts of the gastro-intestinal tract or with release of inositol or of phosphate, the absorbable products of phytate degradation. Remarkably, the effect of dietary phytase on tissue inositol phosphates has not been studied. The objective of this study was to determine effect of phytase supplementation on liver and kidney myo-inositol and myo-inositol phosphates in broiler chickens. For this, methods were developed to measure inositol phosphates in chicken tissues. The study comprised wheat/soy-based diets containing one of three levels of phytase (0, 500 and 6,000 FTU/kg of modified E. coli 6-phytase). Diets were provided to broilers for 21 D and on day 21 digesta were collected from the gizzard and ileum. Liver and kidney tissue were harvested. Myo-inositol and inositol phosphates were measured in diet, digesta, liver and kidney. Gizzard and ileal content inositol was increased progressively, and total inositol phosphates reduced progressively, by phytase supplementation. The predominant higher inositol phosphates detected in tissues, D-and/or L-Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 and Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P5, differed from those (D-and/or L-Ins(1,2,3,4)P4, D-and/or L-Ins(1,2,5,6)P4, Ins(1,2,3,4,6)P5, D-and/or L-Ins(1,2,3,4,5)P5 and D-and/or L-Ins(1,2,4,5,6)P5) generated from phytate (InsP6) degradation by E. coli 6-phytase or endogenous feed phytase, suggesting tissue inositol phosphates are not the result of direct absorption. Kidney inositol phosphates were reduced progressively by phytase supplementation. These data suggest that tissue inositol phosphate concentrations can be influenced by dietary phytase inclusion rate and that such effects are tissue specific, though the consequences for physiology of such changes have yet to be elucidated.

Indexed as

6-PhytaseAnimal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsChickensDietary SupplementsDigestionEscherichia coliInositol PhosphatesKidneyPhosphatesPhytic AcidPoultry6-PhytaseInositol PhosphatesPhosphatesPhytic Acid

Identifiers

PMID36260560
PMCPMC9581429
OpenAlexW4306816443

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.