Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36260666›Full record

ReviewScience advances2022

Mapping of machine learning approaches for description, prediction, and causal inference in the social and health sciences.

Anja K Leist, Matthias Klee, Jung Hyun Kim, David H Rehkopf, Stéphane P A Bordas, Graciela Muniz-Terrera, Sara Wade

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Science advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Theory and practice in biomedical informatics: a framework for discovery.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. An Exploration of Machine Learning Methods in Human Biomonitoring.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Mining the gaps: Deciphering Alzheimer's biology through AI-driven reconciliation.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025
    Article
  18. Uncovering the Role of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Cognitive Impairment Progression.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anja K LeistDepartment of Social Sciences, Institute for Research on Socio-Economic Inequality (IRSEI), University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0002-5074-5209
Matthias KleeDepartment of Social Sciences, Institute for Research on Socio-Economic Inequality (IRSEI), University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0002-1629-482X
Jung Hyun KimDepartment of Social Sciences, Institute for Research on Socio-Economic Inequality (IRSEI), University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0001-7313-5481
David H RehkopfDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7597-6513
Stéphane P A BordasDepartment of Engineering, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Graciela Muniz-TerreraCentre for Dementia Prevention, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Sara WadeSchool of Mathematics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6547-5555

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) methodology used in the social and health sciences needs to fit the intended research purposes of description, prediction, or causal inference. This paper provides a comprehensive, systematic meta-mapping of research questions in the social and health sciences to appropriate ML approaches by incorporating the necessary requirements to statistical analysis in these disciplines. We map the established classification into description, prediction, counterfactual prediction, and causal structural learning to common research goals, such as estimating prevalence of adverse social or health outcomes, predicting the risk of an event, and identifying risk factors or causes of adverse outcomes, and explain common ML performance metrics. Such mapping may help to fully exploit the benefits of ML while considering domain-specific aspects relevant to the social and health sciences and hopefully contribute to the acceleration of the uptake of ML applications to advance both basic and applied social and health sciences research.

Identifiers

PMID36260666
PMCPMC9581488

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.