Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36261833›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2022

Accuracy of SCORTEN in predicting mortality in toxic epidermal necrolysis.

Jerzy Strużyna, Agnieszka Surowiecka, Tomasz Korzeniowski, Patrycja Korulczyk, Lukasz Drozd, Aldona Stachura, Kamil Torres, Andrzej Krajewski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jerzy StrużynaEast Center of Burns Treatment and Reconstructive Surgery, Medical University of Lublin, Łęczna, Poland.
Agnieszka SurowieckaEast Center of Burns Treatment and Reconstructive Surgery, Medical University of Lublin, Łęczna, Poland. [email protected].ORCID 0000-0003-3360-716X
Tomasz KorzeniowskiEast Center of Burns Treatment and Reconstructive Surgery, Medical University of Lublin, Łęczna, Poland.
Patrycja KorulczykChair and Department of Didactics and Medical Simulation, Medical University of Lublin, Łęczna, Poland.
Lukasz DrozdEast Center of Burns Treatment and Reconstructive Surgery, Medical University of Lublin, Łęczna, Poland.
Aldona StachuraEast Center of Burns Treatment and Reconstructive Surgery, Medical University of Lublin, Łęczna, Poland.
Kamil TorresEast Center of Burns Treatment and Reconstructive Surgery, Medical University of Lublin, Łęczna, Poland.
Andrzej KrajewskiEast Center of Burns Treatment and Reconstructive Surgery, Medical University of Lublin, Łęczna, Poland.
Medical University of Lublin · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundToxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) patients require multi-directional and multi-disciplinary treatment. In most cases, they are hospitalised at intensive care units and require multi-directional, burn-complication preventive care. Choosing the most appropriate treatment option might be troublesome even when predicting scores are used. SCORTEN is the most renowned prognostic score for TEN patients, however, there are some data indicating that the accuracy of this test may be limited. The credibility of not just the predicted mortality risk, but also componential laboratory results and clinical features subject to debate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and credibility of SCORTEN in clinical practice, on proprietary material.

methodsA retrospective analysis of 35 patients with diagnosed in histopathology TEN was performed. The inclusion criteria were as follows: day of submission before 5th day from the onset of the symptoms, full protocol of plasmaphereses and IVIGs according to our scheme. Our protocol includes cycle of plasmapheresis with frozen fresh plasma twice daily for the first 2 days following admission, and once daily for the subsequent 5 to 7 days. IVIGs were administered after the first two sessions of plasmapheresis, for 4 to 7 days. The dosage was calculated according to body weight, at 0.4 to 0.5 g/kg per dose.

resultsThe sensitivity of SCORTEN for the analysed cohort was 100%, with a specificity of 24%. The estimated death was 41,9%, while the actual death rates were 12,5%. Our protocol improved the survival, OR = 26,57, RR = 6,34, p = 0,022. Decrease in mortality was caused by a combined treatment protocol we use- plasmaphereses with IVIGs. No independent risk factor was significant in death evaluation.

conclusionOur data suggest that the scoring system for predicting death among TEN patients are reliable when they are high. New prognostic factors should be found to improve the evaluation of patients with low SCORTEN.

Indexed as

Stevens-Johnson SyndromeHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexBurnIVIGsPlasmapheresisToxic epidermal necrolysisWound

Identifiers

PMID36261833
PMCPMC9583545
OpenAlexW4306790252

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.