Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36264251›Full record

SynthesisBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2023

The effect of progestin therapy in advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Willem Jan van Weelden, Philine B Birkendahl, Roy I Lalisang, Joanna IntHout, Roy F P M Kruitwagen, Andrea Romano, Johanna M A Pijnenborg

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Willem Jan van WeeldenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5413-9556
Philine B BirkendahlDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Roy I LalisangDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Joanna IntHoutDepartment for Health Evidence, Section Biostatistics, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Roy F P M KruitwagenGROW-School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Andrea RomanoGROW-School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Johanna M A PijnenborgDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6138-1236
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFifteen percent of patients with endometrial cancer (EC) have advanced stage disease or develop a recurrence. Progestins have been applied as systemic treatment for decades, but there is limited evidence on response prediction with biomarkers and toxicity.

objectivesTo review the response and toxicity of progestin therapy and stratify response to progesterone receptor (PR) expression and tumour grade. SEARCH STRATEGY: We used the search terms 'Endometrial cancer', 'Progestins', 'Disease progression', 'Recurrence' and related terms in Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane databases. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies on patients with advanced stage or recurrent EC treated with progestin monotherapy were included. Studies on adjuvant therapy, with fewer than ten cases and with sarcoma histology were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Evaluation for bias was performed with the Revised Cochrane RoB2 tool for randomised studies and the ROBINS-I tool for non-randomised studies. A random effects meta-analysis was performed with the overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate and toxicity as primary outcome measures. MAIN

resultsTwenty-six studies (1639 patients) were included. The ORR of progestin therapy was 30% (95% CI 25-36), the clinical benefit rate was 52% (95% CI 42-61). In PR-positive EC, the ORR was 55%, compared with 12% in PR-negative disease (risk difference 43%, 95% CI 15-71). Severe toxicity occurred in 6.5%.

conclusionsProgestin therapy is a viable treatment option in patients with advanced stage and recurrent EC with low toxicity and high ORR in PR-positive disease. The role of PR expression in relation to progression-free survival and overall survival is unclear.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsProgestinsFemaleHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProgestinsadvanced stageendometrial cancermedroxyprogesterone acetatemegestrol acetatemeta-analysisprogestin therapyrecurrencesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36264251
PMCPMC10100186
OpenAlexW4306910798

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.