Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36264277›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental botany2023

A 'wiring diagram' for source strength traits impacting wheat yield potential.

Erik H Murchie, Matthew Reynolds, Gustavo A Slafer, M John Foulkes, Liana Acevedo-Siaca, Lorna McAusland, Robert Sharwood, Simon Griffiths, Richard B Flavell, Jeff Gwyn and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental botany, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Current Challenges in Cereal Breeding.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Sink-Source Relationship in Cucumber (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Erik H MurchieDivision of Plant and Crop Science, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington LE12 5RD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7465-845X
Matthew ReynoldsInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km. 45, Carretera Mexico-Veracruz, El Batan, Texcoco, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-4291-4316
Gustavo A SlaferDepartment of Crop and Forest Sciences, University of Lleida-AGROTECNIO-CERCA Center, Av. R. Roure 191, 25198 Lleida, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1766-4247
M John FoulkesDivision of Plant and Crop Science, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington LE12 5RD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7765-8340
Liana Acevedo-SiacaInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km. 45, Carretera Mexico-Veracruz, El Batan, Texcoco, Mexico.
Lorna McAuslandDivision of Plant and Crop Science, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington LE12 5RD, UK.
Robert SharwoodHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Richmond NSW 2753, Australia.
Simon GriffithsJohn Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Colney Ln, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2435-7963
Richard B FlavellInternational Wheat Yield Partnership, 1500 Research Parkway, College Station, TX 77843, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0898-4636
Jeff GwynInternational Wheat Yield Partnership, 1500 Research Parkway, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Mark SawkinsInternational Wheat Yield Partnership, 1500 Research Parkway, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Elizabete Carmo-SilvaLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6059-9359

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/ N020871/2Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N021061/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S005072/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council IWYP48
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Source traits are currently of great interest for the enhancement of yield potential; for example, much effort is being expended to find ways of modifying photosynthesis. However, photosynthesis is but one component of crop regulation, so sink activities and the coordination of diverse processes throughout the crop must be considered in an integrated, systems approach. A set of 'wiring diagrams' has been devised as a visual tool to integrate the interactions of component processes at different stages of wheat development. They enable the roles of chloroplast, leaf, and whole-canopy processes to be seen in the context of sink development and crop growth as a whole. In this review, we dissect source traits both anatomically (foliar and non-foliar) and temporally (pre- and post-anthesis), and consider the evidence for their regulation at local and whole-plant/crop levels. We consider how the formation of a canopy creates challenges (self-occlusion) and opportunities (dynamic photosynthesis) for components of photosynthesis. Lastly, we discuss the regulation of source activity by feedback regulation. The review is written in the framework of the wiring diagrams which, as integrated descriptors of traits underpinning grain yield, are designed to provide a potential workspace for breeders and other crop scientists that, along with high-throughput and precision phenotyping data, genetics, and bioinformatics, will help build future dynamic models of trait and gene interactions to achieve yield gains in wheat and other field crops.

Indexed as

Edible GrainTriticumPhenotypePhotosynthesisPlant LeavesBiomassbreedingphotosynthesissource–sinkyield physiology

Identifiers

PMID36264277
PMCPMC9786870

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.