Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36264848›Full record

ReviewEcology letters2022

Towards the fully automated monitoring of ecological communities.

Marc Besson, Jamie Alison, Kim Bjerge, Thomas E Gorochowski, Toke T Høye, Tommaso Jucker, Hjalte M R Mann, Christopher F Clements

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ecology letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Advances in causal discovery methods for ecological time series.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Advancing the Spatiotemporal Dimension of Wildlife-Pollution Interactions.Environmental science & technology letters · 2025
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marc BessonSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3381-322X
Jamie AlisonDepartment of Ecoscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6787-6192
Kim BjergeDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6742-9504
Thomas E GorochowskiSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1702-786X
Toke T HøyeDepartment of Ecoscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5387-3284
Tommaso JuckerSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0751-6312
Hjalte M R MannDepartment of Ecoscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4768-4767
Christopher F ClementsSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5677-5401

Funding

Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond 8021-00423BEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council BB/W013959/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/N510129/1Natural Environment Research Council NE/S01537X/1Natural Environment Research Council NE/T003502/1Natural Environment Research Council NE/T006579/1Royal Society RGS\R2\192033Royal Society UF160357
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-resolution monitoring is fundamental to understand ecosystems dynamics in an era of global change and biodiversity declines. While real-time and automated monitoring of abiotic components has been possible for some time, monitoring biotic components-for example, individual behaviours and traits, and species abundance and distribution-is far more challenging. Recent technological advancements offer potential solutions to achieve this through: (i) increasingly affordable high-throughput recording hardware, which can collect rich multidimensional data, and (ii) increasingly accessible artificial intelligence approaches, which can extract ecological knowledge from large datasets. However, automating the monitoring of facets of ecological communities via such technologies has primarily been achieved at low spatiotemporal resolutions within limited steps of the monitoring workflow. Here, we review existing technologies for data recording and processing that enable automated monitoring of ecological communities. We then present novel frameworks that combine such technologies, forming fully automated pipelines to detect, track, classify and count multiple species, and record behavioural and morphological traits, at resolutions which have previously been impossible to achieve. Based on these rapidly developing technologies, we illustrate a solution to one of the greatest challenges in ecology: the ability to rapidly generate high-resolution, multidimensional and standardised data across complex ecologies.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEcosystemBiodiversityBiotacommunity ecologycomputer visiondeep learninghigh-resolution monitoringremote sensing

Identifiers

PMID36264848
PMCPMC9828790

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.