ReviewJACC. Cardiovascular interventions2022
Position Statement on Vascular Access Safety for Percutaneous Devices in AMI Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
Review in JACC. Cardiovascular interventions, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- SCAI/EAPCI/ACVC Expert Consensus Statement on Cardiogenic Shock in Women.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Guideline
- Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Prognostic Significance of Gait Recovery after Mechanical Circulatory Support Weaning in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A 14-Day Landmark Analysis.Progress in rehabilitation medicine · 2026Article
- Coronary Artery Revascularization in the Older Adult Population: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2025Review
- Evolution of Critical Care Cardiology: An Update on Structure, Care Delivery, Training, and Research Paradigms: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2025Article
- Safety and Efficacy of a Plug-Based Vascular Closure Device After Percutaneous Microaxial Flow Pump in the Treatment of Complex and High-Risk Indicated Patients.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025Observational
- Left Ventricular Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for Cardiogenic Shock After Myocardial Infarction.Cardiology and therapy · 2025Review
- SCAI/EAPCI/ACVC Expert Consensus Statement on Cardiogenic Shock in Women: This statement was endorsed by the Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA).Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
- Outcomes with mechanical circulatory support devices among patients with mechanical complications of acute myocardial infarction.European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care · 2025Observational
- Review
- Protocol-Driven Best Practices and Cardiogenic Shock Survival in Asian Patients.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Access Options for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Bridging Care Gaps for Older Women Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Interventional cardiology clinics · 2025Review
- Chronological vs Biological Age in Interventional Cardiology: A Comprehensive Approach to Care for Older Adults: JACC Family Series.JACC. Cardiovascular interventions · 2024Review
- Cardiogenic Shock in Older Adults: A Focus on Age-Associated Risks and Approach to Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2024Review
- TAVR in Older Adults: Moving Toward a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and Away From Chronological Age:JACC. Advances · 2024Article
- Contemporary approach to cardiogenic shock care: a state-of-the-art review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Best practices for vascular arterial access and closure: a contemporary guide for the cardiac catheterization laboratory.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Assessment and Management of Older Adults Undergoing PCI, Part 1: AJACC. Advances · 2023Article
- Management of Stable Angina in the Older Adult Population.Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the United States, the frequency of using percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock is increasing. These devices require large-bore vascular access to provide left, right, or biventricular cardiac support, frequently under urgent/emergent circumstances. Significant technical and logistical variability exists in device insertion, care, and removal in the cardiac catheterization laboratory and in the cardiac intensive care unit. This variability in practice may contribute to adverse outcomes observed in centers that receive patients with cardiogenic shock, who are at higher risk for circulatory insufficiency, venous stasis, bleeding, and arterial hypoperfusion. In this position statement, we aim to: 1) describe the public health impact of bleeding and vascular complications in cardiogenic shock; 2) highlight knowledge gaps for vascular safety and provide a roadmap for a regulatory perspective necessary for advancing the field; 3) propose a minimum core set of process elements, or "vascular safety bundle"; and 4) develop a possible study design for a pragmatic trial platform to evaluate which structured approach to vascular access drives most benefit and prevents vascular and bleeding complications in practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.