ReviewInternational wound journal2023
Global research status of pathological scar reported over the period 2001-2021: A 20-year bibliometric analysis.
Review in International wound journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Efficacy of High-Frequency Ultrasound Precision Monitoring Ring Drilling in the Treatment of Pathologic Scarring.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Trial
- Understanding and Comparing Current Practice for Ear Keloid Scars: A Narrative Systematic Review.Journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2026Review
- Application of IFN-γ-Licensed urine-derived stem cells in SIS hydrogel promotes scar-free wound healing by immunomodulation and microenvironment remodeling.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research Trends in Hair Loss Treatment: Key Contributions, Emerging Hotspots, and Future Directions.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2026Article
- Research Trends and Hotspots in Hypertrophic Scar: A Bibliometric Analysis over the Past Five Decades.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Article
- Bletilla striata polysaccharide microneedles with astragaloside Ⅳ loaded ZIF-8 nanoparticles for wound healing and anti-scar treatment.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Article
- Personalized human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosome pre-treatment based on the simulation of scar microenvironment characteristics: a promising approach for early scar treatment.Molecular biology reports · 2025Article
- Precision exosome engineering for enhanced wound healing and scar revision.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Enhanced Closed Incisional Negative Pressure Therapy for Treating Infectious Scars.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- A Glimpse of Research Trends and Frontiers in the Etiology of Premature Ovarian InsufficiencyEndocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2025Review
- Global research status of pathological scar reported over the period 2001-2021: A 20-year bibliometric analysis.International wound journal · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pathological scar is a classic problem in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Although the researches on pathological scar have been conducted for decades, the way to go to address this thorny problem still remains challenging. To the best of our knowledge, few bibliometric analysis concerning pathological scar have been reported. In this study, we set out to employ bibliometric and visual analysis to offer research status and trends of pathological scar over the period 2001-2021. All publications covering pathological scar during 2001-2021 were retrieved and extracted from the Web of Science database. We applied VOSviewer software to evaluate the keywords and research hotpots, and the online tool (http://bibliometric.com/) was used to carried out the publication trends analysis. A total of 2221 pathological scar-related articles were identified over the period 2001-2021. China is the country which had the largest volume of publications (819, 36.87%), followed by the United States (416, 18.73%), Japan (144, 6.48%), Korea (142, 6.39%), and England (118, 5.31%). Among the institutions and journals, Shanghai Jiao Tong University (167) and Wound Repair and Regeneration (85) accounted for the most papers related to pathological scar, respectively. Professor Bayat A, who had the most citation frequency (2303), made great contribution in pathological scar field. "Fibroblast", "expression", and "proliferation" were identified as the pathological scar research hotspot through analysis of the keywords. In terms of publication, China ranked first all over the world, but the numbers of publication are inconsistent with the citation frequency, ranking first and second, respectively. Shanghai Jiao Tong University and journal Wound Repair and Regeneration stand for the highest level of research in this field to a certain extent. In the early stage, the research focus was mainly on the prevention, treatment, and risk factors for recurrence of pathological scar from cases. In the later stage, the research focus was on the comprehensive management, in which the mechanism research was in-depth to the molecular and gene level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.