ReviewCurrent environmental health reports2022
Metals Exposures and DNA Methylation: Current Evidence and Future Directions.
Review in Current environmental health reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Environmental Toxic Metals and Metalloids Exposure and Cardiovascular Health: Current Evidence from Oxidative Stress and Inflammatory Biomarkers as Indicators of Subclinical Cardiovascular Effects.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Combined Occupational Exposure to Lead and Other Metals and Risk of Lung Cancer.La Medicina del lavoro · 2026Article
- CRISPR-Cas9 screening identifies ATOX1-driven cisplatin resistance mechanisms in liver cancer and evaluates targeted inhibitor efficacy.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Impact of a prenatal exposure mixture of metals on DNA methylation-derived cell-type composition in cord blood.Environmental epigenetics · 2026Article
- Environmental exposures and epigenetic alterations in common chronic diseases: insights and challenges.Environmental epigenetics · 2026Review
- Metal accumulation in paired colon cancer and adjacent tissues and its relationship with genotoxic and epigenetic biomarkers.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Lead Exposure and Bladder Cancer: Molecular Insights from TCGA RNA-Seq and Toxicogenomic Integration.Cancers · 2025Article
- Association between blood heavy metal levels and COPD risk: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES data.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Prenatal exposures to endocrine disrupting chemicals: The role of multi-omics in understanding toxicity.Molecular and cellular endocrinology · 2023Review
- The Epigenetics of Migraine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- DNA methylation as a potential mediator between environmental pollutants and osteoporosis; a current hypothesis.BioImpacts : BI · 2023Article
- Global DNA methylation and the association between metal exposure and chronic kidney disease.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of the reviewExposure to essential and non-essential metals is widespread. Metals exposure is linked to epigenetic, particularly DNA methylation, differences. The strength of evidence with respect to the metal exposure type, timing, and level, as well as the DNA methylation association magnitude, and reproducibility are not clear. Focusing on the most recent 3 years, we reviewed the human epidemiologic evidence (n = 26 studies) and the toxicologic animal model evidence (n = 18 studies) for associations between metals exposure and DNA methylation. RECENT
findingsIn humans, the greatest number of studies focused on lead exposure, followed by studies examining cadmium and arsenic. Approximately half of studies considered metals exposure during the in utero period and measured DNA methylation with the genome-wide Illumina arrays in newborn blood or placenta. Few studies performed formal replication testing or meta-analyses. Toxicology studies of metals and epigenetics had diversity in model systems (mice, rats, drosophila, tilapia, and zebrafish were represented), high heterogeneity of tissues used for DNA methylation measure (liver, testis, ovary, heart, blood, brain, muscle, lung, kidney, whole embryo), and a variety of technologies used for DNA methylation assessment (global, gene specific, genome-wide). The most common metals tested in toxicologic studies were lead and cadmium. Together, the recent studies reviewed provide the strongest evidence for DNA methylation signatures with prenatal metals exposures. There is also mounting epidemiologic evidence supporting lead, arsenic, and cadmium exposures with DNA methylation signatures in adults. The field of metals and DNA methylation is strengthened by the inclusion of both epidemiology and toxicology approaches, and further advancements can be made by coordinating efforts or integrating analyses across studies. Future advances in understanding the molecular basis of sequence specific epigenetic responses to metals exposures, methods for handling exposure mixtures in a genome-wide analytic framework, and pipelines to facilitate collaborative testing will continue to advance the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.