ArticleInternational journal of nursing sciences2022
Development and validation of the Nurse's Workplace Mental Health Questionnaire.
Article in International journal of nursing sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Measuring Positive and Negative Attitudes Associated With the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Profession: Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Analysis of ASUAITIN.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- The role of psychological flexibility in the relationship between empathy and flourishing among clinical nurses: a cross-sectional mediation analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Postoperative LEDVT Risk Assessment System for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
- Validity of the Chinese Mandarin version of the compassionate engagement and action scales for self and others for nursing students.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Cross-cultural adaptation and reliability of the inventory of vicarious posttraumatic growth and research of its influencing factors: a cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Self-Efficacy Perception Scale for Administrator Nurses.International journal of nursing sciences · 2023Review
- Translation and validation study of the Chinese version of the service user technology acceptability questionnaire.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to develop and validate the Nurse's Workplace Mental Health Questionnaire (NWMHQ). Methods: The questionnaire was developed based on the two continua model of mental illness and health proposed by Keyes. The initial questionnaire was generated through literature review, two rounds of Delphi expert consultation, followed by a pilot survey. Finally, the reliability and validity of the questionnaire were validated through an online survey of 2,815 registered nurses selected from the public hospitals in 11 provinces from June to July 2020. Results: The item-content validity index (I-CVI) of the questionnaire ranged from 0.750 to 1.000 and the average scale-level content validity index (S-CVI/Ave) was 0.906. Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.948 and test-retest reliability was 0.850. The self-rating depression scale score was negatively related to the NWMHQ score ( Conclusion: The NWMHQ developed in this study showed good reliability and validity. This questionnaire may help assess the mental health status of nurses and help nursing managers to develop appropriate targeted psychological interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.