ReviewRevista de neurologia2022
[From the laboratory to the clinic in acute ischaemic stroke. In vitro and in vivo experimental models].
Review in Revista de neurologia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neuroprotective and Antioxidant Properties of Different Novel Steroid-Derived Nitrones and Oximes on Cerebral Ischemia In Vitro.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- In Vitro Modulation of Autophagy by New Antioxidant Nitrones as a Potential Therapeutic Approach for the Treatment of Ischemic Stroke.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Neuroprotective and Antioxidant Properties of CholesteroNitrone ChN2 and QuinolylNitrone QN23 in an Experimental Model of Cerebral Ischemia: Involvement of Necrotic and Apoptotic Cell Death.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCerebrovascular disease is one of the leading causes of death, disability and dementia around the world. For the most common form of the disease, ischaemic stroke, there is only one drug available, tissue plasminogen activator, and few patients can benefit from this therapy because of the strict inclusion criteria established for its use. This circumstance makes it crucial to search for new forms of treatment to combat the sequelae of the disease, and this requires the development of new biomimetic models that allow for a better understanding of its evolution. DEVELOPMENT: In this review, we update the platforms and models most widely used in recent years to study the pathophysiology of ischaemic stroke. On the one hand, we review the two- and three-dimensional platforms on which in vitro assays are carried out and, on the other, we describe the most commonly used in vivo experimental models and techniques for assessing ischaemic damage.
conclusionsThe ultimate aim of developing good experimental models is to find new forms of treatment and thus improve patients' prognosis and quality of life. It is therefore important to generate new in vitro devices and to further refine in vivo models to enable a good clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.