Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36288802›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2022

Genomic Signatures of Mitonuclear Coevolution in Mammals.

Ryan J Weaver, Samantha Rabinowitz, Kiley Thueson, Justin C Havird

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Sensitivity of genome-wide tests for mitonuclear genetic incompatibilities.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Negative Selection inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Mitochondrial Ribosomal Proteins and Cancer.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Nuclear compensatory evolution driven by mito-nuclear incompatibilities.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ryan J WeaverDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.ORCID 0000-0002-6160-4735
Samantha RabinowitzDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas, Austin, TX.
Kiley ThuesonDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas, Austin, TX.
Justin C HavirdDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas, Austin, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-8692-6503
The University of Texas at Austin · USIowa State University · US

Funding

Causes and Consequences of Mitochondrial MutationsR35GM142836 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI HAVIRD, JUSTIN C · 2021 to 2025
$2.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM142836
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mitochondrial (mt) and nuclear-encoded proteins are integrated in aerobic respiration, requiring co-functionality among gene products from fundamentally different genomes. Different evolutionary rates, inheritance mechanisms, and selection pressures set the stage for incompatibilities between interacting products of the two genomes. The mitonuclear coevolution hypothesis posits that incompatibilities may be avoided if evolution in one genome selects for complementary changes in interacting genes encoded by the other genome. Nuclear compensation, in which deleterious mtDNA changes are offset by compensatory nuclear changes, is often invoked as the primary mechanism for mitonuclear coevolution. Yet, direct evidence supporting nuclear compensation is rare. Here, we used data from 58 mammalian species representing eight orders to show strong correlations between evolutionary rates of mt and nuclear-encoded mt-targeted (N-mt) proteins, but not between mt and non-mt-targeted nuclear proteins, providing strong support for mitonuclear coevolution across mammals. N-mt genes with direct mt interactions also showed the strongest correlations. Although most N-mt genes had elevated dN/dS ratios compared to mt genes (as predicted under nuclear compensation), N-mt sites in close contact with mt proteins were not overrepresented for signs of positive selection compared to noncontact N-mt sites (contrary to predictions of nuclear compensation). Furthermore, temporal patterns of N-mt and mt amino acid substitutions did not support predictions of nuclear compensation, even in positively selected, functionally important residues with direct mitonuclear contacts. Overall, our results strongly support mitonuclear coevolution across ∼170 million years of mammalian evolution but fail to support nuclear compensation as the major mode of mitonuclear coevolution.

Indexed as

DNA, MitochondrialGenes, MitochondrialAnimalsCell NucleusGenomicsMammalsMitochondrial ProteinsDNA, MitochondrialMitochondrial Proteinscoevolutionmitochondriamitonuclear interactionsnuclear compensation

Identifiers

PMID36288802
PMCPMC9641969
OpenAlexW4307430102

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.