Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36297062›Full record

ReviewNutrients2022

Benefits and Risks of Early Life Iron Supplementation.

Shasta A McMillen, Richard Dean, Eileen Dihardja, Peng Ji, Bo Lönnerdal

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. BiofortifiedMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. [Importance and supply of micronutrients in infants, children and adolescents].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shasta A McMillenDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7373-3844
Richard DeanDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Eileen DihardjaDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Peng JiDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7447-5688
Bo LönnerdalDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3459-2484
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infants are frequently supplemented with iron to prevent iron deficiency, but iron supplements may have adverse effects on infant health. Although iron supplements can be highly effective at improving iron status and preventing iron deficiency anemia, iron may adversely affect growth and development, and may increase risk for certain infections. Several reviews exist in this area; however, none has fully summarized all reported outcomes of iron supplementation during infancy. In this review, we summarize the risks and benefits of iron supplementation as they have been reported in controlled studies and in relevant animal models. Additionally, we discuss the mechanisms that may underly beneficial and adverse effects.

Indexed as

Anemia, Iron-DeficiencyIron DeficienciesAnimalsDietary SupplementsIronRisk AssessmentIrongrowthgut microbiomeinfant nutritioniron deficiency anemiairon supplementneurodevelopmentoxidative stresstrace mineral interactions

Identifiers

PMID36297062
PMCPMC9608469
OpenAlexW4306773171

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.