Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36298402›Full record

SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

A Systematic Review of Internet of Things in Clinical Laboratories: Opportunities, Advantages, and Challenges.

Tahir Munir, Muhammad Soomair Akbar, Sadia Ahmed, Azza Sarfraz, Zouina Sarfraz, Muzna Sarfraz, Miguel Felix, Ivan Cherrez-Ojeda

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Evolution of Hybrid Intelligence and Its Application in Evidence-Based Medicine: A Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Tahir MunirDepartment of Research, Nishtar Medical University, Multan 66000, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-7802-573X
Muhammad Soomair AkbarDepartment of Research, Independent Medical College, Faisalabad 44000, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-4767-9244
Sadia AhmedDepartment of Research, Punjab Medical College, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan.
Azza SarfrazDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, The Aga Khan University, Karachi 74800, Pakistan.
Zouina SarfrazDepartment of Research and Publications, Fatima Jinnah Medical University, Lahore 54000, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-5132-7455
Muzna SarfrazDepartment of Research, King Edward Medical University, Lahore 54000, Pakistan.
Miguel FelixDepartment of Pulmonology, Universidad Espíritu Santo, Samborondón 092301, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-2243-3646
Ivan Cherrez-OjedaDepartment of Pulmonology, Universidad Espíritu Santo, Samborondón 092301, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-1610-239X
Punjab Medical College · PKUniversidad de Especialidades Espíritu Santo · ECAga Khan University · PKFatima Jinnah Medical University · PKKing Edward Medical University · PKNishtar Medical College and Hospital · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) is the network of physical objects embedded with sensors, software, electronics, and online connectivity systems. This study explores the role of IoT in clinical laboratory processes; this systematic review was conducted adhering to the PRISMA Statement 2020 guidelines. We included IoT models and applications across preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical laboratory processes. PubMed, Cochrane Central, CINAHL Plus, Scopus, IEEE, and A.C.M. Digital library were searched between August 2015 to August 2022; the data were tabulated. Cohen's coefficient of agreement was calculated to quantify inter-reviewer agreements; a total of 18 studies were included with Cohen's coefficient computed to be 0.91. The included studies were divided into three classifications based on availability, including preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical. The majority (77.8%) of the studies were real-tested. Communication-based approaches were the most common (83.3%), followed by application-based approaches (44.4%) and sensor-based approaches (33.3%) among the included studies. Open issues and challenges across the included studies included scalability, costs and energy consumption, interoperability, privacy and security, and performance issues. In this study, we identified, classified, and evaluated IoT applicability in clinical laboratory systems. This study presents pertinent findings for IoT development across clinical laboratory systems, for which it is essential that more rigorous and efficient testing and studies be conducted in the future.

Indexed as

Internet of ThingsComputer SecurityLaboratories, ClinicalPrivacySoftwareapproachesarchitectureblockchainclinical laboratoriescloud metricscomputinghealthcareinternet of things

Identifiers

PMID36298402
PMCPMC9611742
OpenAlexW4307658819

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.