Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36298428›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Brain Age Prediction: A Comparison between Machine Learning Models Using Brain Morphometric Data.

Juhyuk Han, Seo Yeong Kim, Junhyeok Lee, Won Hee Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Juhyuk HanDepartment of Software Convergence, Kyung Hee University, Yongin 17104, Korea.
Seo Yeong KimDepartment of Software Convergence, Kyung Hee University, Yongin 17104, Korea.
Junhyeok LeeDepartment of Software Convergence, Kyung Hee University, Yongin 17104, Korea.
Won Hee LeeDepartment of Software Convergence, Kyung Hee University, Yongin 17104, Korea.

Funding

Korea Health Industry Development Institute HI22C0108National Research Foundation of Korea 2021R1C1C1009436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain structural morphology varies over the aging trajectory, and the prediction of a person's age using brain morphological features can help the detection of an abnormal aging process. Neuroimaging-based brain age is widely used to quantify an individual's brain health as deviation from a normative brain aging trajectory. Machine learning approaches are expanding the potential for accurate brain age prediction but are challenging due to the great variety of machine learning algorithms. Here, we aimed to compare the performance of the machine learning models used to estimate brain age using brain morphological measures derived from structural magnetic resonance imaging scans. We evaluated 27 machine learning models, applied to three independent datasets from the Human Connectome Project (HCP,

Indexed as

ConnectomeMachine LearningAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsBrainHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedYoung Adultbrain age predictionbrain morphometrymachine learningstructural magnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID36298428
PMCPMC9608785

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.