Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36302574›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Calibrating a network meta-analysis of diabetes trials of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor analogues and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors to a representative routine population: a systematic review protocol.

Elaine Butterly, Lili Wei, Amanda I Adler, Saleh A M Almazam, Khalid Alsallumi, Luke A K Blackbourn, Sofia Dias, Peter Hanlon, Katherine Hughes, Jim Lewsey and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Elaine ButterlySchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9410-0237
Lili WeiSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Amanda I AdlerDiabetes Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Saleh A M AlmazamSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Khalid AlsallumiSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Luke A K BlackbournInstitute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Sofia DiasCentre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, Select State, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2172-0221
Peter HanlonSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5828-3934
Katherine HughesDepartment of Diabetes, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Jim LewseySchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3811-8165
Robert LindsayUniversity of Glasgow BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Stuart McGurnaghanInstitute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3292-4633
John PetrieUniversity of Glasgow BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
David PhillippoPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Naveed SattarInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1604-2593
Laurie A TomlinsonEpidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8848-9493
Nicky WeltonPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Sarah WildPublic Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
David McAllisterSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK david.mcallister@glasgow.ac.uk.
University of Glasgow · GBInstitute of Genetics and Cancer · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P015298/1Medical Research Council MR/W016648/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionParticipants in randomised controlled trials (trials) are generally younger and healthier than many individuals encountered in clinical practice. Consequently, the applicability of trial findings is often uncertain. To address this, results from trials can be calibrated to more representative data sources. In a network meta-analysis, using a novel approach which allows the inclusion of trials whether or not individual-level participant data (IPD) is available, we will calibrate trials for three drug classes (sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP1) receptor analogues and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors) to the Scottish diabetes register. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Medline and EMBASE databases, the US clinical trials registry (clinicaltrials.gov) and the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (chictr.org.cn) will be searched from 1 January 2002. Two independent reviewers will apply eligibility criteria to identify trials for inclusion. Included trials will be phase 3 or 4 trials of SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP1 receptor analogues or DPP4 inhibitors, with placebo or active comparators, in participants with type 2 diabetes, with at least one of glycaemic control, change in body weight or major adverse cardiovascular event as outcomes. Unregistered trials will be excluded.We have identified a target population from the population-based Scottish diabetes register. The chosen cohort comprises people in Scotland with type 2 diabetes who either (1) require further treatment due to poor glycaemic control where any of the three drug classes may be suitable, or (2) who have adequate glycaemic control but are already on one of the three drug classes of interest or insulin. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for IPD use was obtained from the University of Glasgow MVLS College Ethics Committee (Project: 200160070). The Scottish diabetes register has approval from the Scottish A Research Ethics Committee (11/AL/0225) and operates with Public Benefit and Privacy Panel for Health and Social Care approval (1617-0147). PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020184174.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV InhibitorsSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsDipeptidyl-Peptidases and Tripeptidyl-PeptidasesGlucagon-Like Peptide-1 ReceptorHumansHypoglycemic AgentsNetwork Meta-Analysis as TopicSystematic Reviews as TopicDipeptidyl-Peptidase IV InhibitorsDipeptidyl-Peptidases and Tripeptidyl-PeptidasesGlucagon-Like Peptide-1 ReceptorHypoglycemic AgentsSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsClinical trialsDIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGYEPIDEMIOLOGYPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID36302574
PMCPMC9621152
OpenAlexW4307446877

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.