Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36302782›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Gauging the skin resident Leishmania parasites through a loop mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay in post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis.

Prakash Ghosh, Rajashree Chowdhury, Shomik Maruf, Albert Picado, Faria Hossain, Sophie I Owen, Rupen Nath, James Baker, Md Golam Hasnain, Mohammad Sohel Shomik and 15 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Prakash Ghosh *Nutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
Rajashree Chowdhury *Nutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
Shomik Maruf *Nutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
Albert Picado *Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND), Geneva, Switzerland.
Faria HossainNutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
Sophie I OwenDepartment of Tropical Disease Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM), Liverpool, UK.
Rupen NathNutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
James BakerNutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
Md Golam HasnainSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Mohammad Sohel ShomikNutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
Debashis GhoshNutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
Masud RashidNational Heart Foundation and Research Institute, Mirpur, 1216, Bangladesh.
Md Utba RashidNutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
Soumik Kha SagarNutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
Md Abu RahatNutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
Ariful BasherInfectious Disease Hospital, Mohakhali, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
Proggananda NathInfectious and Tropical Medicine Department, Mymensingh Medical College and Hospital (MMCH), Mymensingh, 2200, Bangladesh.
Thomas EdwardsDepartment of Tropical Disease Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM), Liverpool, UK.
Jason R AndrewsStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Malcolm S DuthieHDT Bio, Suite 280, 1616 Eastlake Ave E, Seattle, WA, 98102, USA.
Dziedzom K de SouzaFoundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND), Geneva, Switzerland.
Emily R AdamsDepartment of Tropical Disease Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM), Liverpool, UK.
Joseph NdunguFoundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND), Geneva, Switzerland.
Israel Cruz *Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND), Geneva, Switzerland.
Dinesh Mondal *Nutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh. din63d@icddrb.org.
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BDFoundation for Innovative New Diagnostics · CHLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESMymensingh Medical College Hospital · BDNational Heart Foundation Hospital & Research Institute · BDStanford University · USUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N013514/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 108080/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the availability of highly sensitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods, the dearth of remotely deployable diagnostic tools circumvents the early and accurate detection of individuals with post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL). Here, we evaluate a design-locked loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay to diagnose PKDL. A total of 76 snip-skin samples collected from individuals with probable PKDL (clinical presentation and a positive rK39 rapid diagnostic test (RDT)) were assessed by microscopy, qPCR, and LAMP. An equal number of age and sex-matched healthy controls were included to determine the specificity of the LAMP assay. The LAMP assay with a Qiagen DNA extraction (Q-LAMP) showed a promising sensitivity of 72.37% (95% CI: 60.91-82.01%) for identifying the PKDL cases. LAMP assay sensitivity declined when the DNA was extracted using a boil-spin method. Q-qPCR showed 68.42% (56.75-78.61%) sensitivity, comparable to LAMP and with an excellent agreement, whereas the microscopy exhibited a weak sensitivity of 39.47% (28.44-51.35%). When microscopy and/or qPCR were considered the gold standard, Q-LAMP exhibited an elevated sensitivity of 89.7% (95% CI: 78.83-96.11%) for detection of PKDL cases and Bayesian latent class modeling substantiated the excellent sensitivity of the assay. All healthy controls were found to be negative. Notwithstanding the optimum efficiency of the LAMP assay towards the detection of PKDL cases, further optimization of the boil-spin method is warranted to permit remote use of the assay.

Indexed as

Leishmania donovaniLeishmaniasis, CutaneousLeishmaniasis, VisceralParasitesSkin Diseases, ParasiticAnimalsBayes TheoremHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesReal-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

Identifiers

PMID36302782
PMCPMC9614002
OpenAlexW4307366721

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.