Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36306156›Full record

ArticleJMIR cancer2022

Role for a Web-Based Intervention to Alleviate Distress in People With Newly Diagnosed Testicular Cancer: Mixed Methods Study.

Ciara Conduit, Christina Guo, Allan B Smith, Orlando Rincones, Olivia Baenziger, Benjamin Thomas, Jeremy Goad, Dan Lenaghan, Nathan Lawrentschuk, Lih-Ming Wong and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Online support needs and preferences for survivors of testicular cancer: a qualitative descriptive study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Exploring online discussions in men with testicular cancer: a qualitative and sentiment analysis of Reddit posts.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Ciara ConduitPersonalised Oncology, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5258-4130
Christina GuoThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1645-3202
Allan B SmithIngham Institute for Applied Medical Research & University of New South Wales, Liverpool, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2496-7369
Orlando RinconesIngham Institute for Applied Medical Research & University of New South Wales, Liverpool, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9727-7871
Olivia BaenzigerPersonalised Oncology, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5100-7542
Benjamin ThomasDepartment of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1330-122X
Jeremy GoadCancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4356-7360
Dan LenaghanUrology, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2504-7422
Nathan LawrentschukDepartment of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8553-5618
Lih-Ming WongEpworth Healthcare, East Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0490-7876
Niall M CorcoranDepartment of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4483-6945
Margaret RossPsychosocial Cancer Care and Palliative Care, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4867-5165
Peter GibbsPersonalised Oncology, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1423-4484
Sophie O'HairePersonalised Oncology, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1283-8831
Angelyn AntonPersonalised Oncology, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8459-7961
Elizabeth LiowPersonalised Oncology, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3598-5095
Jeremy LewinMedical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4305-117X
Ben TranPersonalised Oncology, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9124-354X
The University of Melbourne · AUWalter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUSt Vincent's Hospital Melbourne · AUUNSW Sydney · AUEpworth Hospital · AUPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AURoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDistress is common immediately after diagnosis of testicular cancer. It has historically been difficult to engage people in care models to alleviate distress because of complex factors, including differential coping strategies and influences of social gender norms. Existing support specifically focuses on long-term survivors of testicular cancer, leaving an unmet need for age-appropriate and sex-sensitized support for individuals with distress shortly after diagnosis.

objectiveWe evaluated a web-based intervention, Nuts & Bolts, designed to provide support and alleviate distress after diagnosis of testicular cancer.

methodsUsing a mixed methods design to evaluate the acceptability, feasibility, and impact of Nuts & Bolts on distress, we randomly assigned participants with recently diagnosed testicular cancer (1:1) access to Nuts & Bolts at the time of consent (early) or alternatively, 1 week later (day 8; delayed). Participants completed serial questionnaires across a 4- to 5-week period to evaluate levels of distress (measured by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer [DT]; scored 0-10), anxiety, and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score [HADS]-Anxiety and HADS-Depression; each scored 0-21). The primary end point was change in distress between consent and day 8. Secondary end points of distress, anxiety, and depression were assessed at defined intervals during follow-up. Optional, semistructured interviews occurring after completion of quantitative assessments were thematically analyzed.

resultsOverall, 39 participants were enrolled in this study. The median time from orchidectomy to study consent was 14.8 (range 3-62) days. Moderate or high levels of distress evaluated using DT were reported in 58% (23/39) of participants at consent and reduced to 13% (5/38) after 1 week of observation. Early intervention with Nuts & Bolts did not significantly decrease the mean DT score by day 8 compared with delayed intervention (early: 4.56-2.74 vs delayed: 4.47-2.74; P=.85), who did not yet have access to the website. A higher baseline DT score was significantly predictive of reduction in DT score during this period (P<.001). Median DT, HADS-Anxiety, and HADS-Depression scores reduced between orchidectomy and 3 weeks postoperatively and then remained stable throughout the observation period. Thematic analysis of 16 semistructured interviews revealed 4 key themes, "Nuts & Bolts is a helpful tool," "Maximizing benefits of the website," "Whirlwind of diagnosis and readiness for treatment," and "Primary stressors and worries," as well as multiple subthemes.

conclusionsDistress is common following the diagnosis of testicular cancer; however, it decreases over time. Nuts & Bolts was considered useful, acceptable, and relevant by individuals diagnosed with testicular cancer, with strong support for the intervention rendered by thematic analyses of semistructured interviews. The best time to introduce support, such as Nuts & Bolts, is yet to be determined; however, it may be most beneficial as soon as testicular cancer is strongly suspected or diagnosed.

Indexed as

anxiety disorderscancer survivorsdepressionemotional distresstesticular germ cell tumor

Identifiers

PMID36306156
PMCPMC9652729
OpenAlexW4295678372

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.