Evidence mapPaperPMID 36307808Full record

ReviewMolecular cancer2022

Antioxidants in brain tumors: current therapeutic significance and future prospects.

Xuchen Qi, Saurabh Kumar Jha, Niraj Kumar Jha, Saikat Dewanjee, Abhijit Dey, Rahul Deka, Pingal Pritam, Kritika Ramgopal, Weiting Liu, Kaijian Hou

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Targeting macro- and micro-nutrient regulation of HNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Anti-Hangover and Hepatoprotective Effects of the Leaf Extract ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Xuchen QiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing, 312000, Zhejiang, China.
Saurabh Kumar JhaDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Engineering & Technology, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, 201310, India. saurabh.jha@sharda.ac.in.ORCID 0000-0002-7437-0755
Niraj Kumar JhaDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Engineering & Technology, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, 201310, India.
Saikat DewanjeeAdvanced Pharmacognosy Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700032, India.
Abhijit DeyDepartment of Life Sciences, Presidency University, 86/1 College Street, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700032, India.
Rahul DekaDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Engineering & Technology, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, 201310, India.
Pingal PritamDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Engineering & Technology, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, 201310, India.
Kritika RamgopalDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Engineering & Technology, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, 201310, India.
Weiting LiuSchool of Nursing, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, 230001, Anhui, China. liuweiting1213@126.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4234-9783
Kaijian HouSchool of Nursing, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, 230001, Anhui, China. kaijianhou@126.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1733-0068
Sharda University · INAnhui University · CNAnhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNChandigarh University · INJadavpur University · INPresidency University · INSir Run Run Shaw Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain cancer is regarded among the deadliest forms of cancer worldwide. The distinct tumor microenvironment and inherent characteristics of brain tumor cells virtually render them resistant to the majority of conventional and advanced therapies. Oxidative stress (OS) is a key disruptor of normal brain homeostasis and is involved in carcinogenesis of different forms of brain cancers. Thus, antioxidants may inhibit tumorigenesis by preventing OS induced by various oncogenic factors. Antioxidants are hypothesized to inhibit cancer initiation by endorsing DNA repair and suppressing cancer progression by creating an energy crisis for preneoplastic cells, resulting in antiproliferative effects. These effects are referred to as chemopreventive effects mediated by an antioxidant mechanism. In addition, antioxidants minimize chemotherapy-induced nonspecific organ toxicity and prolong survival. Antioxidants also support the prooxidant chemistry that demonstrate chemotherapeutic potential, particularly at high or pharmacological doses and trigger OS by promoting free radical production, which is essential for activating cell death pathways. A growing body of evidence also revealed the roles of exogenous antioxidants as adjuvants and their ability to reverse chemoresistance. In this review, we explain the influences of different exogenous and endogenous antioxidants on brain cancers with reference to their chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic roles. The role of antioxidants on metabolic reprogramming and their influence on downstream signaling events induced by tumor suppressor gene mutations are critically discussed. Finally, the review hypothesized that both pro- and antioxidant roles are involved in the anticancer mechanisms of the antioxidant molecules by killing neoplastic cells and inhibiting tumor recurrence followed by conventional cancer treatments. The requirements of pro- and antioxidant effects of exogenous antioxidants in brain tumor treatment under different conditions are critically discussed along with the reasons behind the conflicting outcomes in different reports. Finally, we also mention the influencing factors that regulate the pharmacology of the exogenous antioxidants in brain cancer treatment. In conclusion, to achieve consistent clinical outcomes with antioxidant treatments in brain cancers, rigorous mechanistic studies are required with respect to the types, forms, and stages of brain tumors. The concomitant treatment regimens also need adequate consideration.

Indexed as

AntioxidantsBrain NeoplasmsCarcinogenesisHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOxidative StressReactive Oxygen SpeciesTumor MicroenvironmentAntioxidantsReactive Oxygen SpeciesAntioxidantBrain tumorChemopreventive roleChemotherapyDietary antioxidantsGene mutationGlioblastomaGliomaMetabolic reprogrammingOxidative stress

Identifiers

PMID36307808
PMCPMC9615186
OpenAlexW4307839888

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.