ReviewMolecular cancer2022
Antioxidants in brain tumors: current therapeutic significance and future prospects.
Review in Molecular cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.
- From Plant Propagation to Anticancer Activity: Phytochemical and Biological Evaluation of Water Extracts ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Review
- Smart nanoparticle delivery systems for curcumin: a targeted strategy to enhance anticancer efficacy and bioavailability.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026Review
- The evolution of chemotherapy in brain tumors: from historical milestones to precision medicine in glioblastoma.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2026Review
- Oxidative stress and molecular chaperones: a dynamic crosstalk in neurodegenerative disorders.Translational neuroscience · 2026Review
- Small molecular weight polyfluoroalkyl phosphonates induce ROS-mediated cytotoxicity in glioblastoma cells: a molecular mechanism study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Photoactivatable immunostimulatory nanoengineered microalgae for boosting cascade-activated antitumor immunity.Science advances · 2025Article
- Troxerutin Potentiated Temozolomide Induced Antitumor Effect in 2D and 3D Glioblastoma Models.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Article
- Targeting macro- and micro-nutrient regulation of HNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025Review
- Oxidative Stress and Antioxidants in Glioblastoma: Mechanisms of Action, Therapeutic Effects and Future Directions.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Nanoengineered hydrogels disrupt tumor antioxidant defense via photothermal-chemodynamic synergy and oxidative stress boosts.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Article
- Exploring the role of inflammatory regulatory effects of probiotics as adjuvants in cancer development management with considering possible challenges: a comprehensive review.Inflammopharmacology · 2025Review
- A Comprehensive Review on the Molecular Mechanism of Lycopene in Cancer Therapy.Food science & nutrition · 2025Review
- Emerging Chemotherapy Targets: Insights from Advances in Glioma Treatment.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Mitochondrial oxidative stress inhibited Sirt3/Foxo3/PPARα pathway and aggravated copper and zinc co-deficiency-induced hepatic lipotoxicity in a fish model.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2025Article
- Anti-Hangover and Hepatoprotective Effects of the Leaf Extract ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Cardiolipin Dysregulation in Glioblastoma-Effects on Mitochondrial Function Tumor Cell Death and Sensitivity to Mitochondria-Targeting Drugs.Journal of cellular physiology · 2025Review
- Latent Association Between Diets and Glioma Risk: A Mendelian Randomization Analysis.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Molecular Mechanisms and Pathways of Mesenchymal Stem Cell-mediated Therapy in Brain Cancer.Current stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
- Research trends in glioma chemoradiotherapy resistance: a bibliometric analysis (2003-2023).Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain cancer is regarded among the deadliest forms of cancer worldwide. The distinct tumor microenvironment and inherent characteristics of brain tumor cells virtually render them resistant to the majority of conventional and advanced therapies. Oxidative stress (OS) is a key disruptor of normal brain homeostasis and is involved in carcinogenesis of different forms of brain cancers. Thus, antioxidants may inhibit tumorigenesis by preventing OS induced by various oncogenic factors. Antioxidants are hypothesized to inhibit cancer initiation by endorsing DNA repair and suppressing cancer progression by creating an energy crisis for preneoplastic cells, resulting in antiproliferative effects. These effects are referred to as chemopreventive effects mediated by an antioxidant mechanism. In addition, antioxidants minimize chemotherapy-induced nonspecific organ toxicity and prolong survival. Antioxidants also support the prooxidant chemistry that demonstrate chemotherapeutic potential, particularly at high or pharmacological doses and trigger OS by promoting free radical production, which is essential for activating cell death pathways. A growing body of evidence also revealed the roles of exogenous antioxidants as adjuvants and their ability to reverse chemoresistance. In this review, we explain the influences of different exogenous and endogenous antioxidants on brain cancers with reference to their chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic roles. The role of antioxidants on metabolic reprogramming and their influence on downstream signaling events induced by tumor suppressor gene mutations are critically discussed. Finally, the review hypothesized that both pro- and antioxidant roles are involved in the anticancer mechanisms of the antioxidant molecules by killing neoplastic cells and inhibiting tumor recurrence followed by conventional cancer treatments. The requirements of pro- and antioxidant effects of exogenous antioxidants in brain tumor treatment under different conditions are critically discussed along with the reasons behind the conflicting outcomes in different reports. Finally, we also mention the influencing factors that regulate the pharmacology of the exogenous antioxidants in brain cancer treatment. In conclusion, to achieve consistent clinical outcomes with antioxidant treatments in brain cancers, rigorous mechanistic studies are required with respect to the types, forms, and stages of brain tumors. The concomitant treatment regimens also need adequate consideration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.