Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36312652›Full record

ReviewCureus2022

Ocular Gene Therapy: A Literature Review With Focus on Current Clinical Trials.

Vaibhavi B Wasnik, Archana R Thool

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vaibhavi B WasnikOpthalmology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences University (DMIMSU), Wardha, IND.
Archana R ThoolOphthalmology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences University (DMIMSU), Wardha, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene therapy has been one of the most researched topics in the last decade. It has now become a revolutionized therapeutic tool of modern medicine. Gene therapy is the alteration of the defective gene involved in the disease process in the host cells. It delivers therapeutic genetic information via modified viral or non-viral vectors. Ocular gene therapy, in particular, has progressed in treating inherited retinal diseases since the eye is a favourable organ for gene therapy development. The advantage of the eye as a target for gene therapy is attributed to its easy accessibility and blood-ocular barrier. Several ongoing clinical trials are investigating various gene therapies for other ocular diseases, including neovascular age-related macular degeneration, retinitis pigmentosa (RP), Usher syndrome, glaucoma, and several others. However, there are challenges such as ocular inflammation and humoral response, infection by the viral vectors, and insertional mutagenesis. These limitations depend on several factors; whether viral or non-viral vectors are used, which viral vectors were used, the route of administration, whether subretinal, intravitreal, or suprachoroidal, and the dose of vectors and the target tissue. These complications may lead to therapeutic failure and vision loss due to intraocular inflammation. This review aims to summarize existing knowledge about ocular gene therapy and the associated limitations we face, with a special focus on a few ongoing clinical trials.

Indexed as

age-related macular degenerationocular gene therapyocular inflammationretinitis pigmentosaviral vectors

Identifiers

PMID36312652
PMCPMC9590687

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.