Evidence mapPaperPMID 36313072Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2022

Gut microbiota and obesity: New insights.

Yoredy Sarmiento-Andrade, Rosario Suárez, Beatriz Quintero, Kleber Garrochamba, Sebastián Pablo Chapela

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. The impact of probiotics on glycemic control during the first 3 months after sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective placebo‑controlled study.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Supplementation of mixedFrontiers in nutrition · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yoredy Sarmiento-AndradeSchool of Medicine, Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, Loja, Ecuador.
Rosario SuárezSchool of Medicine, Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, Loja, Ecuador.
Beatriz QuinteroSchool of Medicine, Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, Loja, Ecuador.
Kleber GarrochambaDepartment of Health Sciences, Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, Loja, Ecuador.
Sebastián Pablo ChapelaDepartamento de Bioquímica Humana, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obesity is a pathology whose incidence is increasing throughout the world. There are many pathologies associated with obesity. In recent years, the influence of the microbiota on both health and pathological states has been known. There is growing information related to changes in the microbiome and obesity, as well as its associated pathologies. Changes associated with age, exercise, and weight changes have been described. In addition, metabolic changes associated with the microbiota, bariatric surgery, and fecal matter transplantation are described. In this review, we summarize the biology and physiology of microbiota in obese patients, its role in the pathophysiology of several disorders associated, and the emerging therapeutic applications of prebiotics, probiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation.

Indexed as

gutmicrobiomemicrobiotaobesityoverweight

Identifiers

PMID36313072
PMCPMC9614660

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.