Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36313505›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2022

Analysis of macular microvasculature with optical coherence tomography angiography for migraine: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Weishaer Ke, Naiji Yu, Xin Liu, Yuxiang Gu, Qiyu Qin, Zifan Ye, Yuhang Li, Kaijun Wang, Min Chen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Machine learning-based migraine analysis using retinal vessel diameters from optical coherence tomography: an alternative approach.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Weishaer KeEye Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Naiji YuEye Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Xin LiuEye Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Yuxiang GuEye Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Qiyu QinEye Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Zifan YeEye Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Yuhang LiEye Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Kaijun WangEye Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Min ChenEye Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the features of macular microvasculature with optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) among migraine patients. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library for studies that evaluated the macular microvasculature of migraine patients. The weighted mean differences (WMDs) of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ), foveal superficial capillary plexus (SCP) vessel density (VD), parafoveal SCP VD, foveal deep capillary plexus (DCP) VD, and parafoveal DCP VD with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) among migraine with aura (MA) group, migraine without aura (MO) group, and healthy controls (HC) group were analyzed using a random-effect model. P < 0.05 was considered significant in statistical analyses. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and statistical tests (Egger's test and Begg's test). Results: Nine studies covering 675 individuals were enrolled in this meta-analysis ultimately. The FAZ of MA patients was not significantly different from HC (WMD = 0.04, 95% CI -0.00 to 0.09). However, the FAZ of MA was significantly larger than that of HC after correction of publication bias by trim and fill method (WMD = 1.03, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.08). The FAZ of MO patients was similar to that of HC (WMD = 0.03, 95% CI -0.00 to 0.07), while smaller than that of MA patients (WMD = 0.05, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.09). VD of the SCP, either in the foveal or parafoveal area, was not significantly different among the three groups. As for DCP, VD in MA patients was lower when compared with HC in the parafovea (WMD = -1.20, 95% CI -1.88 to -0.51). Conclusions: We found that there was a larger FAZ in MA compared with HC after adjusting for publication bias. The FAZ in MO was not significantly different from that in HC, but significantly lower than that in MA. There was no significant difference in either foveal or parafoveal VD of SCP among MA, MO, and HC participants, while the parafoveal VD of the DCP in MA was lower than that of the HC.

Indexed as

capillarymeta-analysismigraineOCTAvessel density

Identifiers

PMID36313505
PMCPMC9606770

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.