ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Development and validation of a novel prognosis prediction model for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Application of next-generation sequencing in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome: from mechanisms to clinical practice.Blood science (Baltimore, Md.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Somatic mutations are widespread in patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) and are associated with prognosis. However, a practical prognostic model for MDS that incorporates somatic mutations urgently needs to be developed. Methods: A cohort of 201 MDS patients from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database was used to develop the model, and a single-center cohort of 115 MDS cohorts from Northwest China was used for external validation. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to compare the effects of karyotype classifications and gene mutations on the prognosis of MDS patients. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses and Lasso regression were used to screen for key prognostic factors. The shinyapps website was used to create dynamic nomograms with multiple variables. The time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the model's discrimination, accuracy and clinical utility. Results: Six risk factors (age, bone morrow blast percentage, ETV6, TP53, EZH2, and ASXL1) were considered as predictor variables in the nomogram. The nomogram showed excellent discrimination, with respective the area under the ROC curve (AUC) values of 0.850, 0.839, 0.933 for the training cohort at 1 year, 3 years and 5 years; 0.715, 0.802 and 0.750 for the testing cohort at 1 year, 3 years and 5 years; and 0.668, 0.646 and 0.731 for the external validation cohort at 1 year, 3 years and 5 years. The calibration curves and decision curve showed that the nomogram had good consistency and clinical practical benefit. Finally, a stratified analysis showed that MDS patients with high risk had worse survival outcomes than patients with low risk. Conclusion: We developed a nomogram containing six risk factors, which provides reliable and objective predictions of prognosis for MDS patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.