SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2022
Artificial intelligence with magnetic resonance imaging for prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Radiomics-Based AI for Predicting Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy Pathological Response in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence Models Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Predict Response to Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review.ANZ journal of surgery · 2026Pooled it
- MRI radiomics prediction modelling for pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Pooled it
- Deep learning algorithms for predicting pathological complete response in MRI of rectal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Pooled it
- MRI-based radiomics for predicting pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Quality and accuracy of radiomics models in predicting KRAS status in lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Machine learning in predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer using MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The British journal of radiology · 2024Pooled it
- Image-based artificial intelligence for the prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.La Radiologia medica · 2024Pooled it
- Preoperative MRI assessment of rectal cancer for predicting metastasis-free survival-a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled clinical trial.European radiology · 2026Trial
- Automated deep learning model for predicting pathological complete response in rectal cancer: A tool to organ-preserving strategies.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Article
- Rectal Cancer Radiotherapy Response Prediction: Retrospective Study of Development of a Deep Learning-Based Radiomics Model.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Molecularly informed preoperative and response-adapted management of colorectal cancer: evidence, decision boundaries, and emerging directions.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Breast cancer pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence and computational prediction models for risk stratification, treatment response, and outcomes in colorectal cancer: a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Predictive model for sphincter preservation in lower rectal cancer.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Review
- Personalized Medical Approach in Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology: Current Trends and Future Perspectives.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Deformable Mapping of Rectal Cancer Whole-Mount Histology with Restaging MRI at Voxel Scale: A Feasibility Study.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2024Article
- Predicting pathological complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer using merged model integrating MRI-based radiomics and deep learning data.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- GPT-Driven Radiology Report Generation with Fine-Tuned Llama 3.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) models with magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) in predicting pathological complete response(pCR) to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in patients with rectal cancer. Furthermore, assessed the methodological quality of the models. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of science for studies published before 21 June 2022, without any language restrictions. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) and Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) tools were used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. We calculated pooled sensitivity and specificity using random-effects models, I Results: We selected 21 papers for inclusion in the meta-analysis from 1562 retrieved publications, with a total of 1873 people in the validation groups. The meta-analysis showed that AI models based on MRI predicted pCR to nCRT in patients with rectal cancer: a pooled area under the curve (AUC) 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88-0.93), sensitivity of 0.82(95% CI,0.71-0.90), pooled specificity 0.86(95% CI,0.80-0.91). In the subgroup analysis, the pooled AUC of the deep learning(DL) model was 0.97, the pooled AUC of the radiomics model was 0.85; the pooled AUC of the combined model with clinical factors was 0.92, and the pooled AUC of the radiomics model alone was 0.87. The mean RQS score of the included studies was 10.95, accounting for 30.4% of the total score. Conclusions: Radiomics is a promising noninvasive method with high value in predicting pathological response to nCRT in patients with rectal cancer. DL models have higher predictive accuracy than radiomics models, and combined models incorporating clinical factors have higher diagnostic accuracy than radiomics models alone. In the future, prospective, large-scale, multicenter investigations using radiomics approaches will strengthen the diagnostic power of pCR. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42021285630.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.