Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36313772›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2022

Integrating machine learning with electronic health record data to facilitate detection of prolactin level and pharmacovigilance signals in olanzapine-treated patients.

Xiuqing Zhu, Jinqing Hu, Tao Xiao, Shanqing Huang, Dewei Shang, Yuguan Wen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiuqing ZhuDepartment of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jinqing HuDepartment of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Tao XiaoDepartment of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Shanqing HuangDepartment of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Dewei ShangDepartment of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yuguan WenDepartment of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Guangzhou Medical University · CNGuangdong Provincial People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aim: Available evidence suggests elevated serum prolactin (PRL) levels in olanzapine (OLZ)-treated patients with schizophrenia. However, machine learning (ML)-based comprehensive evaluations of the influence of pathophysiological and pharmacological factors on PRL levels in OLZ-treated patients are rare. We aimed to forecast the PRL level in OLZ-treated patients and mine pharmacovigilance information on PRL-related adverse events by integrating ML and electronic health record (EHR) data. Methods: Data were extracted from an EHR system to construct an ML dataset in 672×384 matrix format after preprocessing, which was subsequently randomly divided into a derivation cohort for model development and a validation cohort for model validation (8:2). The eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm was used to build the ML models, the importance of the features and predictive behaviors of which were illustrated by SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP)-based analyses. The sequential forward feature selection approach was used to generate the optimal feature subset. The co-administered drugs that might have influenced PRL levels during OLZ treatment as identified by SHAP analyses were then compared with evidence from disproportionality analyses by using OpenVigil FDA. Results: The 15 features that made the greatest contributions, as ranked by the mean (|SHAP value|), were identified as the optimal feature subset. The features were gender_male, co-administration of risperidone, age, co-administration of aripiprazole, concentration of aripiprazole, concentration of OLZ, progesterone, co-administration of sulpiride, creatine kinase, serum sodium, serum phosphorus, testosterone, platelet distribution width, α-L-fucosidase, and lipoprotein (a). The XGBoost model after feature selection delivered good performance on the validation cohort with a mean absolute error of 0.046, mean squared error of 0.0036, root-mean-squared error of 0.060, and mean relative error of 11%. Risperidone and aripiprazole exhibited the strongest associations with hyperprolactinemia and decreased blood PRL according to the disproportionality analyses, and both were identified as co-administered drugs that influenced PRL levels during OLZ treatment by SHAP analyses. Conclusions: Multiple pathophysiological and pharmacological confounders influence PRL levels associated with effective treatment and PRL-related side-effects in OLZ-treated patients. Our study highlights the feasibility of integration of ML and EHR data to facilitate the detection of PRL levels and pharmacovigilance signals in OLZ-treated patients.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsRisperidoneAripiprazoleBenzodiazepinesElectronic Health RecordsHumansMachine LearningMaleOlanzapinePharmacovigilanceProlactinAntipsychotic AgentsAripiprazoleBenzodiazepinesOlanzapineProlactinRisperidoneelectronic health recordhyperprolactinemiamachine learningolanzapinepharmacovigilanceprolactinSHAPXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID36313772
PMCPMC9606398
OpenAlexW4304822876

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.