Trial reportFrontiers in endocrinology2022
The value of radiomics to predict abnormal bone mass in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients based on CT imaging for paravertebral muscles.
Trial report in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiomics and Back Pain.Global spine journal · 2026Review
- Ultrasound Evaluation of Achilles Tendon Thickness in Diabetic Patients With and Without Foot Complications.Cureus · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Andrology: From Semen Analysis to Image Diagnostics.The world journal of men's health · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence Applications for Osteoporosis Classification Using Computed Tomography.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Sound touch elastography of Achilles tendons in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus versus healthy adults.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2023Article
- Value-based digital health: A systematic literature review of the value elements of digital health care.Digital healthReview
- A Glimpse into the Realm that Combines Artificial Intelligence and Endocrinology.Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolismReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the value of CT imaging features of paravertebral muscles in predicting abnormal bone mass in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods: The clinical and QCT data of 149 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were collected retrospectively. Patients were randomly divided into the training group (n = 90) and the validation group (n = 49). The radiologic model and Nomogram model were established by multivariate Logistic regression analysis. Predictive performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: A total of 829 features were extracted from CT images of paravertebral muscles, and 12 optimal predictive features were obtained by the mRMR and Lasso feature selection methods. The radiomics model can better predict bone abnormality in type 2 diabetes mellitus, and the (Area Under Curve) AUC values of the training group and the validation group were 0.94(95% CI, 0.90-0.99) and 0.90(95% CI, 0.82-0.98). The combined Nomogram model, based on radiomics and clinical characteristics (vertebral CT values), showed better predictive efficacy with an AUC values of 0.97(95% CI, 0.94-1.00) in the training group and 0.95(95% CI, 0.90-1.00) in the validation group, compared with the clinical model. Conclusion: The combination of Nomogram model and radiomics-clinical features of paravertebral muscles has a good predictive value for abnormal bone mass in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.