Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36316653›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2022

Densest subgraph-based methods for protein-protein interaction hot spot prediction.

Ruiming Li, Jung-Yu Lee, Jinn-Moon Yang, Tatsuya Akutsu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ruiming LiBioinformatics Center, Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University, Uji, 611-0011, Kyoto, Japan. lrming1993@gmail.com.
Jung-Yu LeeInstitute of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, 300, Taiwan.
Jinn-Moon YangInstitute of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, 300, Taiwan.
Tatsuya AkutsuBioinformatics Center, Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University, Uji, 611-0011, Kyoto, Japan.
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWKyoto University · JPKyoto University Institute for Chemical Research

Funding

JSPS KAKENHI 22H00532
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHot spots play an important role in protein binding analysis. The residue interaction network is a key point in hot spot prediction, and several graph theory-based methods have been proposed to detect hot spots. Although the existing methods can yield some interesting residues by network analysis, low recall has limited their abilities in finding more potential hot spots.

resultIn this study, we develop three graph theory-based methods to predict hot spots from only a single residue interaction network. We detect the important residues by finding subgraphs with high densities, i.e., high average degrees. Generally, a high degree implies a high binding possibility between protein chains, and thus a subgraph with high density usually relates to binding sites that have a high rate of hot spots. By evaluating the results on 67 complexes from the SKEMPI database, our methods clearly outperform existing graph theory-based methods on recall and F-score. In particular, our main method, Min-SDS, has an average recall of over 0.665 and an f2-score of over 0.364, while the recall and f2-score of the existing methods are less than 0.400 and 0.224, respectively.

conclusionThe Min-SDS method performs best among all tested methods on the hot spot prediction problem, and all three of our methods provide useful approaches for analyzing bionetworks. In addition, the densest subgraph-based methods predict hot spots with only one residue interaction network, which is constructed from spatial atomic coordinate data to mitigate the shortage of data from wet-lab experiments.

Indexed as

Protein Interaction MappingProteinsBinding SitesDatabases, ProteinProtein BindingProteinsBioinformaticsDensest subgraphGraph theoryHot spotLinear programmingNetwork analysisProtein-protein interactionResidue interaction

Identifiers

PMID36316653
PMCPMC9623998
OpenAlexW4307693512

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.