Evidence mapPaperPMID 36318223Full record

ReviewJournal of proteome research2023

The 2022 Report on the Human Proteome from the HUPO Human Proteome Project.

Gilbert S Omenn, Lydie Lane, Christopher M Overall, Charles Pineau, Nicolle H Packer, Ileana M Cristea, Cecilia Lindskog, Susan T Weintraub, Sandra Orchard, Michael H A Roehrl and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of proteome research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Large-scale circulating proteome association study (CPAS) meta-analysis identifies circulating proteins and pathways predicting incident hip fractures.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Proteomic Technology.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The One Hour Human Proteome.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2024
    Article
  16. Liquid Biopsy Proteomics in Ophthalmology.Journal of proteome research · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 17 institutions in 9 countries.

Gilbert S OmennUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan48109, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8976-6074
Lydie LaneCALIPHO Group, SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics and University of Geneva, 1015Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9818-3030
Christopher M OverallUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, British ColumbiaV6T 1Z4, Canada.
Charles PineauFrench Institute of Health and Medical Research, 35042RENNESCedexFrance.
Nicolle H PackerMacquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales2109, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7532-4021
Ileana M CristeaPrinceton University, Princeton, New Jersey08544, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6533-2458
Cecilia LindskogUppsala University, 752 36Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5611-1015
Susan T WeintraubUniversity of Texas Health Science Center-San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas78229-3900, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8328-7814
Sandra OrchardEMBL-EBI, Hinxton, CambridgeshireCB10 1SD, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8878-3972
Michael H A RoehrlMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York10065, United States.
Edouard NiceMonash University, ClaytonVictoria3800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5480-4715
Siqi LiuBGI Group, Shenzhen518083, P. R. China.ORCID 0000-0001-9744-3681
Nuno BandeiraUniversity of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California92093, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8385-3655
Yu-Ju ChenNational Taiwan University, Academia Sinica, Nankang, Taipei11529, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-3178-6697
Tiannan GuoWestlake University Guomics Laboratory of Big Proteomic Data, Hangzhou310024, ZhejiangProvinceP. R. China.ORCID 0000-0003-3869-7651
Ruedi AebersoldInstitute of Molecular Systems Biology in ETH Zurich, 8092Zurich, Switzerland.
Robert L MoritzInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, Washington98109, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3216-9447
Eric W DeutschInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, Washington98109, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8732-0928
Institute for Systems Biology · USBGI Group (China) · CNETH Zurich · CHEuropean Bioinformatics Institute · GBGriffith University · AUInserm · FRMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USMonash University · AUNational Taiwan University · TWPrinceton University · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of Geneva · CHUniversity of Michigan · USUppsala University · SEWestlake University · CN

Funding

The Patient-Reported Outcomes, Community-Engagement and Language (PRO-CEL) CoreP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · 1985 to 2025
$88.4M
Processing and Analyzing Mass Spectrometry Proteomics Data for the Longevity ConsortiumU19AG023122 · TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INST · 2004 to 2025
$16.8M
Pilot Project ProgramP30ES017885 · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · 2025 to 2025
$1.4M
Michigan Center for Translational Cancer ProteogenomicsU24CA271037 · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · 2025 to 2025
$1.2M
Dynamic virus-driven remodeling of ER-mitochondria contactsR01AI174515 · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · 2025 to 2025
$897k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R21 CA251992NCI NIH HHS R21 CA263262NCI NIH HHS U01 CA253217NCI NIH HHS U24 CA210967NCI NIH HHS U24 CA271037NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI174515NIA NIH HHS U19 AG023122NIA NIH HHS UH3 AG064706NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES017885NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM087221NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114141NIGMS NIH HHS R24 GM127667NIH HHS S10 OD026936NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2022 Metrics of the Human Proteome from the HUPO Human Proteome Project (HPP) show that protein expression has now been credibly detected (neXtProt PE1 level) for 18 407 (93.2%) of the 19 750 predicted proteins coded in the human genome, a net gain of 50 since 2021 from data sets generated around the world and reanalyzed by the HPP. Conversely, the number of neXtProt PE2, PE3, and PE4 missing proteins has been reduced by 78 from 1421 to 1343. This represents continuing experimental progress on the human proteome parts list across all the chromosomes, as well as significant reclassifications. Meanwhile, applying proteomics in a vast array of biological and clinical studies continues to yield significant findings and growing integration with other omics platforms. We present highlights from the Chromosome-Centric HPP, Biology and Disease-driven HPP, and HPP Resource Pillars, compare features of mass spectrometry and Olink and Somalogic platforms, note the emergence of translation products from ribosome profiling of small open reading frames, and discuss the launch of the initial HPP Grand Challenge Project, "A Function for Each Protein".

Indexed as

ProteomeProteomicsDatabases, ProteinHumansMass SpectrometryOpen Reading FramesProteomeBiology and Disease-HPP (B/D-HPP)chromosome-centric HPP (C-HPP)Grand Challenge ProjectHuman Protein AtlasHuman Proteome Project (HPP)Mass Spectrometry Interactive Virtual Environment (MassIVE)missing proteins (MP)neXtProt protein existence (PE metrics)non-MS PE1 proteinsPeptideAtlasRibo-Seqsmall open reading frames (smORFs)uncharacterized protein existence 1 (uPE1)

Identifiers

PMID36318223
PMCPMC10081950
OpenAlexW4307840280

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.