Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36326069›Full record

ArticleLab on a chip2022

Developing a transwell millifluidic device for studying blood-brain barrier endothelium.

Ian C Harding, Nicholas R O'Hare, Mark Vigliotti, Alex Caraballo, Claire I Lee, Karina Millican, Ira M Herman, Eno E Ebong

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lab on a chip, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Modular cone-and-plate device for mechanofluidic assays in Transwell inserts.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Towards Novel BiomimeticBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ian C HardingDepartment of Bioengineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Nicholas R O'HareDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Avenue, 129 Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering Complex, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. e.ebong@northeastern.edu.
Mark VigliottiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Avenue, 129 Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering Complex, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. e.ebong@northeastern.edu.
Alex CaraballoDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Avenue, 129 Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering Complex, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. e.ebong@northeastern.edu.
Claire I LeeDepartment of Bioengineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Karina MillicanDepartment of Bioengineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Ira M HermanDepartment of Developmental, Molecular, and Chemical Biology, Tufts School of Graduate Biomedical Sciences, Boston, MA, USA.
Eno E EbongDepartment of Bioengineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9483-1443
Northeastern University · USTufts University · US

Funding

Atheroprotective vs. Atherogenic Glycocalyx Mechanotransduction MechanismsK01HL125499 · NHLBI · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI EBONG, ENO ESSIEN · 2015 to 2019
$770k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL125499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood-brain barrier (BBB) endothelial cell (EC) function depends on flow conditions and on supportive cells, like pericytes and astrocytes, which have been shown to be both beneficial and detrimental for brain EC function. Most studies investigating BBB EC function lack physiological relevance, using sub-physiological shear stress magnitudes and/or omitting pericytes and astrocytes. In this study, we developed a millifluidic device compatible with standard transwell inserts to investigate BBB function. In contrast to standard polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microfluidic devices, this model allows for easy, reproducible shear stress exposure without common limitations of PDMS devices such as inadequate nutrient diffusion and air bubble formation. In no-flow conditions, we first used the device to examine the impact of primary human pericytes and astrocytes on human brain microvascular EC (HBMEC) barrier integrity. Astrocytes, pericytes, and a 1-to-1 ratio of both cell types increased HBMEC barrier integrity

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierDextransAstrocytesCells, CulturedClaudin-5Coculture TechniquesHumansPericytesClaudin-5Dextrans

Identifiers

PMID36326069
PMCPMC11416711
OpenAlexW4308054688

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.