Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36328355›Full record

ArticleGenes & development2022

A synthetic KLHL20 ligand to validate CUL3

Brian M Farrell, Fabian Gerth, Cheng-Hao R Yang, Johannes T-H Yeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes & development, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. De Novo-Designed Bifunctional Proteins for Targeted Protein Degradation.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Altered residence time as a cause of drug resistance.Current opinion in structural biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Cancer-associated TRF1 mutations alter PARP1 interaction dynamics: an in silico study.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brian M Farrell *Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724, USA.
Fabian Gerth *Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724, USA.
Cheng-Hao R YangCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724, USA.
Johannes T-H YehCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724, USA.

Funding

Single-Cell Biology Shared ResourceP30CA045508 · NCI · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI David A Tuveson · 1987 to 2026
$118.9M
Upgrade of 800 MHz SpectrometerS10OD016432 · OD · NEW YORK STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY CENTER · PI PALMER, ARTHUR G · 2014 to 2014
$600k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA045508NIH HHS S10 OD016432
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeted protein degradation (TPD) has risen as a promising therapeutic modality. Leveraging the catalytic nature of the ubiquitin-proteasome enzymatic machinery, TPD exhibits higher potency to eliminate disease-causing target proteins such as oncogenic transcription factors that may otherwise be difficult to abrogate by conventional inhibitors. However, there are challenges that remain. Currently, nearly all degraders engage CUL4

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingUbiquitin-Protein LigasesLigandsProteolysisUbiquitinationAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingLigandsUbiquitin-Protein LigasesCUL3KLHL20macrocyclesPROTACtargeted protein degradation

Identifiers

PMID36328355
PMCPMC9732910

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.