ReviewFrontiers in medicine2022
Characteristic analysis of clinical trials for new traditional Chinese medicines in mainland China from 2013 to 2021.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Analysis of Clinical Trials Using Anti-Tumor Traditional Chinese Medicine Monomers.Drug design, development and therapy · 2024Pooled it
- Does Green Brazilian Propolis Extract Improve Functional Capacity in Symptomatic Chronic Coronary Disease?-A Pilot Randomized Trial.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evolution of Clinical Trials of Systemic Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Between 2005 and 2024: Based on ClinicalTrials.gov.Gastro hep advances · 2025Review
- The neurobiology of plant-based therapeutics in women's reproductive health: mechanisms, efficacy, and clinical translation.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
- Promoting the development and approval of new traditional Chinese medicines in China: a pooled analysis of data from 2013 to 2024.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Traditional Chinese medicine: cardiovascular drug development through a holistic framework.European heart journal · 2024Article
- Registration and characteristics of clinical trials on traditional Chinese medicine and natural medicines for endometriosis: a comprehensive analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Development of clinical trials for non-small cell lung cancer drugs in China from 2005 to 2023.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Based on the clinical trials registered on the platform for the registry and publicity of clinical drug trials of the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA), the registration and approval of clinical trials of traditional Chinese medicines (TCMs) in mainland China from 2013 to 2021 were reviewed. Methods: Clinical trials of new TCMs published in Chinese were retrieved from the platform for the registry and publicity of clinical drug trials. The number of registered trials and approved trials, status of clinical trials, therapeutic area of clinical trials for the treatment of diseases, type of trial design, sample size, sponsors, and leading clinical trial centers were evaluated. Results: From 2013 to 2021, a total of 965 clinical trials of new drugs applied in TCM were registered on the aforementioned NMPA platform, comprising 117 phase I trials, 586 phase II trials, 174 phase III trials, 40 phase IV trials, and 48 other clinical trials. The treatment fields included the respiratory system, alimentary tract and metabolism, genetic system and reproductive hormones, and cardiovascular system. Among the 760 phase II and phase III trials, 98.9% were randomized, 95.4% were double-blind, and 98.2% were parallel controlled trials, and the proportion of placebo-controlled trials increased year by year from 2013 to 2021. From 2013 to 2021, 123 new TCMs were approved in mainland China. Conclusion: From 2015 to 2021, the number of registered clinical trials of new TCMs remained low. The approval rate was also low, but the clinical trial design was greatly improved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.