ArticleScientific reports2022
Learning complex dependency structure of gene regulatory networks from high dimensional microarray data with Gaussian Bayesian networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prokaryotic homeostasis - a solution to thrive and survive.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Review
- Application of Bayesian Algorithm in Risk Quantification for Network Security.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reconstruction of Gene Regulatory Networks (GRNs) of gene expression data with Probabilistic Network Models (PNMs) is an open problem. Gene expression datasets consist of thousand of genes with relatively small sample sizes (i.e. are large-p-small-n). Moreover, dependencies of various orders coexist in the datasets. On the one hand transcription factor encoding genes act like hubs and regulate target genes, on the other hand target genes show local dependencies. In the field of Undirected Network Models (UNMs)-a subclass of PNMs-the Glasso algorithm has been proposed to deal with high dimensional microarray datasets forcing sparsity. To overcome the problem of the complex structure of interactions, modifications of the default Glasso algorithm have been developed that integrate the expected dependency structure in the UNMs beforehand. In this work we advocate the use of a simple score-based Hill Climbing algorithm (HC) that learns Gaussian Bayesian networks leaning on directed acyclic graphs. We compare HC with Glasso and variants in the UNM framework based on their capability to reconstruct GRNs from microarray data from the benchmarking synthetic dataset from the DREAM5 challenge and from real-world data from the Escherichia coli genome. We conclude that dependencies in complex data are learned best by the HC algorithm, presenting them most accurately and efficiently, simultaneously modelling strong local and weaker but significant global connections coexisting in the gene expression dataset. The HC algorithm adapts intrinsically to the complex dependency structure of the dataset, without forcing a specific structure in advance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.