Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36333575›Full record

Observational studyJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2023

Bioimpedance spectroscopy fluid analysis in acute high-risk abdominal surgery, a prospective clinician-blinded observational feasibility study.

M Cihoric, H Kehlet, J Højlund, M L Lauritsen, K Kanstrup, N B Foss

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Digitizing fluid balance monitoring may offer a solution for optimizing patient care.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M CihoricDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hvidovre University Hospital, Kettegaard allé 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark. mirjana.cihoric.03@regionh.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8970-639X
H KehletSection for Surgical Pathophysiology, JMC, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark.
J HøjlundDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hvidovre University Hospital, Kettegaard allé 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark.
M L LauritsenGastrounit, Surgical Section, Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark.
K KanstrupGastrounit, Surgical Section, Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark.
N B FossDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hvidovre University Hospital, Kettegaard allé 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark.
Hvidovre Hospital · DKRigshospitalet · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective assessment of fluid status in critical surgical care may help optimize perioperative fluid administration and prevent postoperative fluid retention. We evaluated the feasibility of hydration status and fluid distribution assessment by Bioimpedance spectroscopy Analysis (BIA) in patients undergoing acute high-risk abdominal (AHA) surgery. This observational study included 73 patients undergoing AHA surgery. During the observational period (0-120 h), we registered BIA calculated absolute fluid overload (AFO) and relative fluid overload (RFO), defined as AFO/extracellular water ratio, as well as cumulative fluid balance and weight. Based on RFO values, hydration status was classified into three categories: dehydrated (RFO <  - 10%), normohydrated (- 10% ≤ RFO ≤  + 15%), overhydrated RFO > 15%. We performed a total of 365 BIA measurements. Preoperative overhydration was found in 16% of patients, increasing to 66% by postoperative day five. The changes in BIA measured AFO correlated with the cumulative fluid balance (r2 = 0.44, p < .001), and change in weight (r2 = 0.55, p < .0001). Perioperative overhydration measured with BIA was associated with worse outcome compared to patients with normo- or dehydration. We have demonstrated the feasibility of obtaining perioperative bedside BIA measurements in patients undergoing AHA surgery. BIA measurements correlated with fluid balance, weight changes, and postoperative clinical complications. BIA-assessed fluid status might add helpful information to guide fluid management in patients undergoing AHA surgery.

Indexed as

Heart FailureWater-Electrolyte ImbalanceWater IntoxicationBody WaterElectric ImpedanceFeasibility StudiesHumansProspective StudiesWaterWaterBioimpedance spectroscopyEmergency laparotomyFluid assessmentFluid overload

Identifiers

PMID36333575
PMCPMC9638275
OpenAlexW4308275628

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.