Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36333759›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2022

How can health technology assessment support our response to public health emergencies?

Aparna Ananthakrishnan, Alia Cynthia Gonzales Luz, Sarin Kc, Leslie Ong, Cecilia Oh, Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai, Saudamini Vishwanath Dabak, Yot Teerawattananon, Hugo C Turner

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on HTAsiaLink network members.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aparna AnanthakrishnanHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand. aparna.a@hitap.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7707-2729
Alia Cynthia Gonzales LuzHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Sarin KcHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Leslie OngAccess and Delivery Partnership, United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Bangkok, Thailand.
Cecilia OhAccess and Delivery Partnership, United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Bangkok, Thailand.
Wanrudee IsaranuwatchaiHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Saudamini Vishwanath DabakHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Yot TeerawattananonHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Hugo C TurnerMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1202541Medical Research Council MR/R015600/1MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis MR/R015600/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public health emergencies (PHEs), such as the COVID-19 crisis, are threats to global health and public order. We recommend that countries bolster their PHE responses by investing in health technology assessment (HTA), defined as a systematic process of gathering pertinent information on and evaluating health technologies from a medical, economic, social and ethical standpoint. We present examples of how HTA organizations in low- and middle-income countries have adapted to supporting PHE-related decisions during COVID-19 and describe the ways HTA can help the response to a PHE. In turn, we advocate for HTA capacity to be further developed globally and for increased institutional acceptance of these methods as a building block for preparedness and response to future PHEs. Finally, the long-term potential of HTA in strengthening health systems and embedding confidence and transparency into scientific policy should be recognized.

Indexed as

COVID-19Technology Assessment, BiomedicalEmergenciesHealth PolicyHumansPublic HealthCOVID-19Economic evaluationEvidence-informed policy-makingHealth policyHealth technology assessmentPandemic preparednessPublic health emergenciesUniversal health coverage

Identifiers

PMID36333759
PMCPMC9636714

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.