Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36335397›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2022

Deciphering the impact of genetic variation on human polyadenylation using APARENT2.

Johannes Linder, Samantha E Koplik, Anshul Kundaje, Georg Seelig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Orthrus: Towards Evolutionary and Functional RNA Foundation Models.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Johannes LinderDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, USA. jlinder2@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2134-7292
Samantha E KoplikDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3614-4885
Anshul KundajeDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3084-2287
Georg SeeligPaul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3163-8782

Funding

GENCODE Resource ProjectU41HG007234 · NHGRI · SANGER INSTITUTE · PI FLICEK, PAUL · 2013 to 2020
$20.3M
Stanford Mendelian Genomics Research CenterU01HG011762 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jonathan Adam Bernstein, Stephen Montgomery · 2021 to 2026
$16.7M
GENCODE: comprehensive reference genome annotation for human and mouseU24HG007234 · NHGRI · EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY · PI Fergal James Martin · 2021 to 2026
$16.1M
Predicting context-specific molecular and phenotypic effects of genetic variation through the lens of the cis-regulatory codeU01HG012069 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Anshul Kundaje · 2021 to 2026
$3.9M
A massively parallel reporter assay for measuring chromatin effects on alternative splicingR21HG010945 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SEELIG, GEORG · 2020 to 2021
$413k
NHGRI NIH HHS R21 HG010945NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG011762NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG012069NHGRI NIH HHS U24 HG007234NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG007234
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background3'-end processing by cleavage and polyadenylation is an important and finely tuned regulatory process during mRNA maturation. Numerous genetic variants are known to cause or contribute to human disorders by disrupting the cis-regulatory code of polyadenylation signals. Yet, due to the complexity of this code, variant interpretation remains challenging.

resultsWe introduce a residual neural network model, APARENT2, that can infer 3'-cleavage and polyadenylation from DNA sequence more accurately than any previous model. This model generalizes to the case of alternative polyadenylation (APA) for a variable number of polyadenylation signals. We demonstrate APARENT2's performance on several variant datasets, including functional reporter data and human 3' aQTLs from GTEx. We apply neural network interpretation methods to gain insights into disrupted or protective higher-order features of polyadenylation. We fine-tune APARENT2 on human tissue-resolved transcriptomic data to elucidate tissue-specific variant effects. By combining APARENT2 with models of mRNA stability, we extend aQTL effect size predictions to the entire 3' untranslated region. Finally, we perform in silico saturation mutagenesis of all human polyadenylation signals and compare the predicted effects of [Formula: see text] million variants against gnomAD. While loss-of-function variants were generally selected against, we also find specific clinical conditions linked to gain-of-function mutations. For example, we detect an association between gain-of-function mutations in the 3'-end and autism spectrum disorder. To experimentally validate APARENT2's predictions, we assayed clinically relevant variants in multiple cell lines, including microglia-derived cells.

conclusionsA sequence-to-function model based on deep residual learning enables accurate functional interpretation of genetic variants in polyadenylation signals and, when coupled with large human variation databases, elucidates the link between functional 3'-end mutations and human health.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderPolyadenylation3' Untranslated RegionsGenetic VariationHumansRNA StabilityTranscriptome3' Untranslated RegionsDeep learningExplainable AIGenomicsNeural networksPolyadenylationRNAUntranslated regionVariant interpretation

Identifiers

PMID36335397
PMCPMC9636789

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.