Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36338102›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2022

The enigmatic clock of dinoflagellates, is it unique?

Dinesh Balasaheb Jadhav, Yoshita Sriramkumar, Sougata Roy

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Circadian rhythms: pervasive, and often times evasive.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dinesh Balasaheb JadhavDepartment of Biology, Ashoka University, Sonipat, Haryana, India.
Yoshita SriramkumarDepartment of Biology, Ashoka University, Sonipat, Haryana, India.
Sougata RoyDepartment of Biology, Ashoka University, Sonipat, Haryana, India.
Ashoka University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dinoflagellate clocks are unique as they show no resemblance to any known model eukaryotic or prokaryotic clock architecture. Dinoflagellates are unicellular, photosynthetic, primarily marine eukaryotes are known for their unique biology and rhythmic physiology. Their physiological rhythms are driven by an internal oscillator whose molecular underpinnings are yet unknown. One of the primary reasons that slowed the progression of their molecular studies is their extremely large and repetitive genomes. Dinoflagellates are primary contributors to the global carbon cycle and oxygen levels, therefore, comprehending their internal clock architecture and its interaction with their physiology becomes a subject of utmost importance. The advent of high throughput Omics technology provided the momentum to understand the molecular architecture and functioning of the dinoflagellate clocks. We use these extensive databases to perform meta-analysis to reveal the status of clock components in dinoflagellates. In this article, we will delve deep into the various "Omics" studies that catered to various breakthroughs in the field of circadian biology in these organisms that were not possible earlier. The overall inference from these omics studies points toward an uncommon eukaryotic clock model, which can provide promising leads to understand the evolution of molecular clocks.

Indexed as

casein kinasecircadian clockdinoflagellatenon transcriptionalphytoplankton

Identifiers

PMID36338102
PMCPMC9627503
OpenAlexW4306842242

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.