Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36338970›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2022

An insight into the runs of homozygosity distribution and breed differentiation in Mangalitsa pigs.

Sowah Addo, Lisa Jung

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sowah AddoAnimal Breeding Section, University of Kassel, Witzenhausen, Germany.
Lisa JungAnimal Breeding Section, University of Kassel, Witzenhausen, Germany.
University of Kassel · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mangalitsa pigs exhibit three distinct coat color patterns based on which they are described as Red, Blond, and Swallow-bellied. The current study investigated genome-wide diversity and selection signatures in the three breeds using fixation index, runs of homozygosity and population structure analyses. The analyses were originally based on quality-controlled data on 77 Mangalitsa animals from Germany, including 23 Blond, 30 Swallow-bellied and 24 Red Mangalitsa genotyped with a customized version of the ProcineSNP60 v2 Genotyping Bead Chip. Also, 20 Hungarian Mangalitsa genotypes were included as outgroup data for comparison. Estimates of observed heterozygosity were 0.27, 0.28, and 0.29, and inbreeding coefficients estimated based on runs of homozygosity were 24.11%, 20.82%, and 16.34% for Blond, Swallow-bellied and Red Mangalitsa, respectively. ROH islands were detected in all breeds, however, none of these were shared amongst them. The KIF16B gene previously reported to play a role in synaptic signaling was found in a ROH island (SSC17: 16-26) in Swallow-bellied Mangalitsa. The same gene was found to harbor a significantly differentiated SNP (MARC0032380) while contrasting either Blond or Red to Swallow-belied Mangalitsa. In the Red Mangalitsa, some ROH islands were associated with genes that play a role in meat quality traits, i.e., ABCA12, VIL1, PLSCR5, and USP37. Our population structure analysis highlighted a separation of the three breeds, but also showed the closest relatedness between Red and Blond Mangalitsa pigs. Findings of this study improve our understanding of the diversity in the three breeds of Mangalitsa pigs.

Indexed as

genetic diversityMangalitsa pigROH islandsruns of homozygosityselection signatures

Identifiers

PMID36338970
PMCPMC9632489
OpenAlexW4306680719

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.