Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36338997›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2022

Identifying lncRNA-disease association based on GAT multiple-operator aggregation and inductive matrix completion.

Yi Zhang, Yu Wang, Xin Li, Yarong Liu, Min Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yi ZhangGuilin University of Technology, Guilin, China.
Yu WangGuilin University of Technology, Guilin, China.
Xin LiGuilin University of Technology, Guilin, China.
Yarong LiuGuilin University of Technology, Guilin, China.
Min ChenSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Hunan Institute of Technology, Hengyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computable models as a fundamental candidate for traditional biological experiments have been applied in inferring lncRNA-disease association (LDA) for many years, without time-consuming and laborious limitations. However, sparsity inherently existing in known heterogeneous bio-data is an obstacle to computable models to improve prediction accuracy further. Therefore, a new computational model composed of multiple mechanisms for lncRNA-disease association (MM-LDA) prediction was proposed, based on the fusion of the graph attention network (GAT) and inductive matrix completion (IMC). MM-LDA has two key steps to improve prediction accuracy: first, a multiple-operator aggregation was designed in the n-heads attention mechanism of the GAT. With this step, features of lncRNA nodes and disease nodes were enhanced. Second, IMC was introduced into the enhanced node features obtained in the first step, and then the LDA network was reconstructed to solve the cold start problem when data deficiency of the entire row or column happened in a known association matrix. Our MM-LDA achieved the following progress: first, using the Adam optimizer that adaptively adjusted the model learning rate could increase the convergent speed and not fall into local optima as well. Second, more excellent predictive ability was achieved against other similar models (with an AUC value of 0.9395 and an AUPR value of 0.8057 obtained from 5-fold cross-validation). Third, a 6.45% lower time cost was consumed against the advanced model GAMCLDA. In short, our MM-LDA achieved a more comprehensive prediction performance in terms of prediction accuracy and time cost.

Indexed as

aggregationassociation predictiongraph attention networkinductive matrix completionmultiple-operator

Identifiers

PMID36338997
PMCPMC9631210

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.