Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36347845›Full record

Trial reportTranslational psychiatry2022

Evaluating cognitive disturbances as treatment target and predictor of antidepressant action in major depressive disorder: A NeuroPharm study.

Vibeke Høyrup Dam, Dea Siggaard Stenbæk, Kristin Köhler-Forsberg, Cheng Ip, Brice Ozenne, Barbara Jacquelyn Sahakian, Gitte Moos Knudsen, Martin Balslev Jørgensen, Vibe Gedsoe Frokjaer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Translational psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02869035 (Predicting Treatment Outcome in Major Depressive Disorder), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02869035 phase1completednot on this map

Predicting Treatment Outcome in Major Depressive Disorder

TypeinterventionalSponsorRigshospitalet, DenmarkRan2016 to 2019Enrolled100ConditionsMajor Depressive DisorderArmsEscitalopram, Duloxetine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. 5-HTBiological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2023
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Vibeke Høyrup DamNeurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. Vibeke.dam@nru.dk.ORCID 0000-0001-5467-5159
Dea Siggaard StenbækNeurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kristin Köhler-ForsbergNeurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Cheng IpNeurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Brice OzenneNeurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Barbara Jacquelyn SahakianDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7352-1745
Gitte Moos KnudsenNeurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1508-6866
Martin Balslev JørgensenNeurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1321-8901
Vibe Gedsoe FrokjaerNeurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive disturbances in major depressive disorder (MDD) constitute a critical treatment target and hold promise as an early predictor of antidepressant treatment response; yet their clinical relevance is not fully established. Therefore, we here investigate if (1) cognitive performance improves over the course of antidepressant treatment and (2) cognitive performance at baseline is predictive of antidepressant treatment response. In the NeuroPharm study (clinical trial id: NCT02869035), 92 antidepressant-free patients with a moderate to severe depressive episode were assessed with a comprehensive cognitive test battery including both cold (emotion-independent) and hot (emotion-dependent) tasks. Patients were tested before and after 12 weeks of standard antidepressant treatment with escitalopram in flexible doses of 10-20 mg. Performance improved across most cognitive domains over the course of antidepressant treatment. Notably, these improvements were independent of improvement in mood symptoms, emphasizing that cognitive disturbances are a distinct symptom and therefore treatment target in MDD. Results did not suggest that performance on any single cognitive measure at baseline was associated with later clinical response to antidepressant treatment. However, a small cluster of patients (N = 28) with globally disturbed cognition at baseline exhibited poorer clinical response after 8 but not 12 weeks of antidepressant treatment, suggesting that severe cognitive disturbances may delay treatment response. Thus, while pretreatment cognitive performance on individual tests may not be useful as clinical markers of treatment response, profiles capturing performance across different cognitive domains may be useful for stratification of patients with MDD and could be helpful in future intervention trials.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionMajor Depressive DisorderAntidepressive AgentsCognitionHumansNeuropsychological TestsAntidepressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID36347845
PMCPMC9643376
OpenAlexW4308525203

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.