ReviewSurgery today2024
Endogenous and exogenous protection from surgically induced reactive oxygen and nitrogen species.
Review in Surgery today, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in electroacupuncture for perioperative neurocognitive disorders: mechanisms and clinical evidence.Chinese medicine · 2026Review
- Correlation between serum GFAP and 3-NT levels and the degree of neuronal injury in patients with glioma after surgery, and its diagnostic value.Biomarkers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgical intervention creates reactive oxygen species through diverse molecular mechanisms, including direct stimulation of immune-mediated inflammation necessary for wound healing. However, dysregulation of redox homeostasis in surgical patients overwhelms the endogenous defense system, slowing the healing process and damaging organs. We broadly surveyed reactive oxygen species that result from surgical interventions and the endogenous and/or exogenous antioxidants that control them. This study assimilates current reports on surgical sources of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species along with literature reports on the effects of endogenous and exogenous antioxidants in human, animal, and clinical settings. Although exogenous antioxidants are generally beneficial, endogenous antioxidant systems account for over 80% of total activity, varying based on patient age, sex, and health or co-morbidity status, especially in smokers, the diabetic, and the obese. Supplementation of exogenous compounds for support in surgical patients is thus theoretically beneficial, but a lack of persuasive clinical evidence has left this potential patient support strategy without clear guidelines. A more thorough understanding of the mechanisms of exogenous antioxidants in patients with compromised health statuses and pharmacokinetic profiling may increase the utility of such support in both the operating and recovery rooms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.