ReviewChinese medicine2022
Traditional Chinese medicine injections: where we are after 80-year development.
Review in Chinese medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Therapeutic effects of traditional Chinese medicine injections with heat-clearing and detoxifying properties on viral pneumonia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- Safflower yellow inChinese herbal medicines · 2026Article
- Mechanistic Insights into Astragalus Membranaceus for Oral Submucosal Fibrosis: A Network Pharmacology and Experimental Approach.Current pharmaceutical design · 2026Article
- Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury after acute myocardial infarction: spatiotemporal mechanisms and endotype-matched multi-target modulation by compounds from traditional Chinese medicine.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Post-marketing safety evaluation of Guhong Injection: a multicenter, prospective real-world study of 30,000 cases in China.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2025Article
- Micro-Flow Imaging: Enhanced Precision in Clarity Assessment of Traditional Chinese Medicine TCM Injections Compared to Light Obscuration and Visual Inspection.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2025Article
- Model-based economic evaluation of pharmacopuncture for chronic low back pain: a 3-year Markov analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- The Mechanism of Catalpol to Improve Oxidative Damage of Dermal Fibroblasts Based on Nrf2/HO-1 Signaling Pathway.Drug design, development and therapy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) injection is the combination of modern pharmaceutical technology and traditional Chinese prescription, which was born in 1941 and played a great role in the backward medical conditions at that time. However, the debate over TCM injections has never stopped due to adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The regulation on TCM injections has been further strengthened since 2017, which has prompted many TCM injections to carry out re-evaluations on quality, safety, efficiency as well as pharmacoeconomics, which made significant changes and progress. This review presented an up-to-date analysis of the types, amounts, and ADRs of TCM injections based on the published data and literature. This review also summarized the potential reasons for the ADRs and re-evaluation strategies. This review will provide some useful clues for TCM injections and their clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.