Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36349072›Full record

ReviewCureus2022

The Effect of Alpha-Cyclodextrin on Postprandial Glucose Excursions: a Systematic Meta-Analysis.

Knut M Wittkowski

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Knut M WittkowskiResearch and Development, ASDERA LLC, New York, USA.
Ministry of Gender and Development · LR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alpha-cyclodextrin (αCD) is a bacterial product that is widely used as a food ingredient. In the European Union (EU), αCD is regulated as a dietary fiber with an authorized health claim "for contributing to the reduction of postprandial glycemic responses." In the US, αCD is generally recognized as save (GRAS), but on April 25, 2022, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) rejected the inclusion of αCD in the list of dietary fibers because "the strength of the scientific evidence does not support a finding of a beneficial effect of αCD on postprandial blood glucose …" To evaluate the strength of this scientific evidence, this meta-analysis reviews clinical trials conducted to test the effect of αCD on the rise of blood glucose and insulin levels during three hours after consumption of a meal comprising carbohydrates, fats, and proteins. Several issues related to the standardization of the outcomes, the choice of the statistical methods in the cross-over studies conducted, and the choice of methods for the aggregation of P-values are discussed. It is concluded that the administration of αCD not only reduces the postprandial glycemic responses, but the absence of an increase in insulin levels suggests that αCD acts independently of increasing insulin production and, thus, the beneficial effect of αCD is not affected by insulin resistance.

Indexed as

dietary fiberdietary supplementhigh carbohydrateinsulinpostprandial blood glucose (ppbg)

Identifiers

PMID36349072
PMCPMC9637372
OpenAlexW4308317698

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.