ReviewCureus2022
The Effect of Alpha-Cyclodextrin on Postprandial Glucose Excursions: a Systematic Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring Cyclodextrin Complexes of Lipophilic Antioxidants: Benefits and Challenges in Nutraceutical Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Cyclodextrins as Modulators of Gut Microbiota: Pharmaceutical Applications and Impact on Intestinal Health.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- How Do Cyclodextrins and Dextrans Affect the Gut Microbiome? Review of Prebiotic Activity.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The Effect of Alpha-Cyclodextrin on Postprandial Glucose Excursions: a Systematic Meta-Analysis.Cureus · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alpha-cyclodextrin (αCD) is a bacterial product that is widely used as a food ingredient. In the European Union (EU), αCD is regulated as a dietary fiber with an authorized health claim "for contributing to the reduction of postprandial glycemic responses." In the US, αCD is generally recognized as save (GRAS), but on April 25, 2022, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) rejected the inclusion of αCD in the list of dietary fibers because "the strength of the scientific evidence does not support a finding of a beneficial effect of αCD on postprandial blood glucose …" To evaluate the strength of this scientific evidence, this meta-analysis reviews clinical trials conducted to test the effect of αCD on the rise of blood glucose and insulin levels during three hours after consumption of a meal comprising carbohydrates, fats, and proteins. Several issues related to the standardization of the outcomes, the choice of the statistical methods in the cross-over studies conducted, and the choice of methods for the aggregation of P-values are discussed. It is concluded that the administration of αCD not only reduces the postprandial glycemic responses, but the absence of an increase in insulin levels suggests that αCD acts independently of increasing insulin production and, thus, the beneficial effect of αCD is not affected by insulin resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.